George-C.-Scott Movie Reviews
More Pages: George-C.-Scott Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10


Better Than Some Say
All Star and All Good
A Tragic Proof That Hutton Is As Good As Actors Come

Please Rerelease This on A New DVD!
Fantastic!
CLASSIC DREW!!!!

T-U-L-I-P
a bit dated but still has that Schrader touch of discomfort.
Descent into a dark realm.....One of the most frightening aspects of the film is the allusion to snuff pornography. ...


Great All star Cast!
QUIRKY THRILLER REQUIRES UNDIVIDED ATTENTION
vastly underrated!

Great All star Cast!
QUIRKY THRILLER REQUIRES UNDIVIDED ATTENTION
vastly underrated!

The Hospital as microcosm of world's problems circa 1971
Number Two of Paddy Chayefsky's Triple Crown.Here Chayefsky takes on the bureaucratization and depersonalization of American medical care (pre the HMO era) and as always his insights and anger are pungent and on-target. Like Network, the satire and exaggeration was uncomfortably closer to the truth than any of us knew. Unfortunately, much of what Chayefsky saw and raved against, in both cases, has come to pass.
The film deals with much more: activism, the nature of love, commitment (to a profession and work as much as to an individual), urbanization and the desire to escape it all...just to name a few.
Centering the film is a simply brilliant performance by George C. Scott as a burned-out Chief of Medicine in an urban hospital: depressed, suicidal, facing the ruins of a marriage, estrangement from his family, and the loss of faith in his professional calling. He's an exhausted, defeated, angry man when we first meet him, who's life will be changed by unlikely events and people.
Scott is riveting and unforgettable. He nails this man, and knows his guilt and rage that has risen from the ruins of what must have once been love and idealism and dedication. As other reviewers have noted, his suicidal rant to Diana Rigg in the middle of the picture is not to be missed, and that alone is worth the price of the video.
The movie is savagely funny and Chayefsky's language, as always, is complex and beautiful. His respect for the competence and courage of professionals battling every sort of odds is evident. No one mined this territory like Chayefski, and this is a terrific script. The production and direction are competent. The supporting cast is fine. But it is Chayefsky's writing and Scott's performance that make it a must see.
Hope for a DVD edition soon.
A CURE FOR WHAT AILS YA....Kudos to the performances of: Barnard Hughes, Nancy Marchand(Lou Grant)and Richard Dysart (St. Elsewhere, LA Law).
And special kudos to Frances Sternhagen.. "Dr Spezio..Dr. Spezio..his chart is not filled out..."
And the best line in the whole film.. "...where do your nurses get their training..Dachau!!!?"
See it, buy it, live it, but don't get sick..who know's what name bracelet you could end up with..
DF

In 1925, a schoolteacher is arrested for teaching Darwinism in the community of Hillsboro, where such scientific refutations of the Bible are illegal. Scott plays prosecutor Matthew Brady (based on politician Williams Jennings Bryan), bringing majesty and tragedy to a character many would find repugnant, as he prophetically bemoans a society moving "from love of God to love of self." Jack Lemmon plays attorney Henry Drummond (based on the legendary Clarence Darrow) and brings his trademark portrayal of the "little guy" to a man determined to protect a citizen's basic right to freedom of thought, proclaiming, "An idea is a greater monument to God than a cathedral." The wonderful supporting cast, including Beau Bridges, Piper Laurie, and John Cullum, all demonstrate their love of a multilayered drama filled with conundrums of faith and contradictions of philosophy. Veteran director Daniel Petrie helms with little flash, but his production offers so many concepts and emotions that the high points of drama remain with the viewer after the film is over. --Lloyd Chesley

One of the few remakes that stands up to the originalMuch of the brilliance of the new version of Inherit the Wind comes from finding two old fogeys who have the same love/hate chamistry brought to life in the original by Frederic March and Spencer Tracy; in this case, the friendly adversaries are George C. Scott, in his last performance before his death, and Jack Lemmon. Toss in Beau Bridges as the wisecracking journalist and a surprisingly downbeat performance by Thom Evertt Scott as the teacher who ends up a guinea pig in one of the biggest trials of the century, and you got yourself a fine film. The comic timing is impeccable on all counts, the lines from the film that have become cliche are delivered with the same freshness that ignited them decades ago, and one can almost believe that Scott and Lemmon actually are Bryan and Darrow haggling it out in a Tennessee courtroom.
If you've never seen _Inherit the Wind_, start with the classic Spencer Tracy/Frederic March version from 1960. If you're a fan of the film already, and have been avoiding this remake because nothing can do the original justics, well, you're right... but it comes as close as possible.
Invaluable
Inherit the Wind (1999)

The DVD transfer
Gripping Final Moments
This movie is better then many people give it credit.

Surviving the first 15 minutes
A Good No-Brainer.
Good Action Movie

Hurray for the director!! Shame on FOX Video!!!The shame on FOX thing was due to the actual DVD being POORLY made as far as sound and picture. The sound is beyond horrible in the first Adam/Eve story and mostly through out. I had to blast my speakers just to hear loud music but faint dialogue. The picture was very dark as well...FOX cheaply converting this to DVD is the reason im told. I had to keep the subtitles on just to understand and catch all the words.
I would still say if you are interested in this picture, DO NOT pass it up just due to the sound issue, I am still very glad I have this DVD and would not consider selling it. I just wish FOX would have took the time they should have with it. Just puts a bad name on FOX video that ive experienced before as well with other classics, like The Robe.
The Bible with Passion!!!As not only the director, but the one who portrays "Noah," my family and I found this to be very close to the first 22 chapters of Genesis, which the film is adapted from. Huston is a phenomenal Noah, and you can actually believe that the period before, during, and after the Flood occurred in this fashion. He is remarkable as the Patriarch who's in love with the animals which the Lord God brings his way and preserves - two-by-two - in order to replenish the Earth after the Flood.
Aside from Noah, probably the most engrossing of them all is Abraham's depiction by George C. Scott, and at times, Scott played Abraham with a heavy hand, and the scene before he is asked to sacrifice Isaac was a bit much, with Scott carrying on very melodramatically. But overall, it was still worth the price for the film.
Do yourself a favor and get this film. Don't take this reviewer's word for it, although I think my word is pretty good, but be the judge for yourself, and while you're watching the film, crack open the Bible and follow along. You'll find it not only instructional, but enjoyable as well. And it may give you a new passion for what's taking place before your eyes.
Highly recommended!!!
Reverential look at the early Bible storiesObviously tackling the "most famous book in the world" would be a daunting task for anyone however within a three hour running time John Huston has managed to create a piece of work on a human level that while very reverant to the material being handled, also never shies away from the harshness and brutality in some of the chapters. Each of these chapters from Genesis has a distinct character of its own and this lavish production does each in turn proud. My personal favourite is the Adam and Eve sequence with a recreation of the famed garden of Eden which is just as I had always envisioned it. Michael Parks and Ulla Bergryd make the perfect Adam and Eve with their youthful goodlooks and innocense. The use of a male figure as the serpent in the mysterious Tree of Knowledge, often criticised, is a vivid and original image to use here and is a great choice. Each of the chapters unfolds with new wonders for the viewer as we pass through the story of Adam and Eve's sons Cain and Able which contains a marvellous performance by Richard Harris as Cain to the story of Noah and the great flood which includes some of the most spectacular special effects of the film in its depiction of the building of the ark and then the forty days and forty nights of rainfall resulting in the extinction of all living things on earth except those saved in the arch. In this sequence John Huston who also narrates as the voice of God makes an appearance as Noah and his refreshing and semi comical depiction of the ark builder is a joy to behold and somehow for me is how I always imagined Noah to actually be, a little eccentric and highly likeable. Later sequences take us through the building of the Tower of Babel with Stephen Boyd as the selfish ruler Nimrod who is reponsible for God mixing up the languages of all mankind so that such a project can never be attempted again, to the saga of Sodom and Gomorrah and God's retribution on those cities who have lost sight of God's teachings. The transformation of Lot's wife into a pillar of Salt is one memorable image in this section of the story. The acting throughout by the leads is memorable and the final lengthy chapter dealing with Abraham and Sarah although drawn out, offers superb performances by legends George C. Scott and Ava Gardner in a beautifully understated performance as Sarah who gives birth to Issac as an old woman.
Perhaps the most breathtaking aspect of "The Bible....In the Beginning", is the sensational use of location photography using the landscapes of Africa and the Middle East to their best advantage. Filmed also in Rome the film boasts lush cinematography by Giuseppe Rotunno in all the chapters and of course as mentioned previously the special effects for scenes such as the expelling of Adam and Eve from the Garden of Eden , the scenes of the great flood and the decadence and eventual destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah are sensational.
"The Bible....In the Beginning" should never be passed off as just another religious film to be viewed at Easter etc. It is vivid storytelling at its best. The use of a narrator instead of a great deal of dialogue between the actors is an original way of presenting the stories and indeed would not be to everyones taste however John Huston's clear narration adds a special element to the unfolding action. Each of the stories of Genesis hold their own pieces of interest and despite the films long running time it is an engrossing visualisation of the stories from the Bible that I grew up with. I always get particular worth out of this movie during the Easter period when my thoughts often go back to those far off times at the start of my religion's history. "The Bible..In the Beginning" is worth looking at as a good piece of cinema but also as one of the best visualisations of these famous stories that you are likely to see. Enjoy!
George C. Scott plays the probably unstable headmaster (think of a postwar Patton about to lose his last job); he is both admirable and scary. Timothy Hutton, who some feel did not handle this role well, plays one of the lead cadets. I think he did the role justice, as his character is torn between honor, being faithful to his school and headmaster, dealing with his friends' differing views on how to handle the situation, and finding a sane way out of an insane situation. Tom Cruise plays one of Hutton's friends, and thinks that they should hold the school, no matter what the cost. Sean Penn plays another friend, who seeks a bloodless resolution, no matter what.
Some reviewers criticize the film because the cadets are portrayed as both villains and heroes. I disagree; I see the kids being portrayed as what they are supposed to be: not-yet-adults with strong ideals put in a no-win situation. Are they supposed to surrender their school/home to keep the peace, even if it violates their ideals and sense of justice? Or, do they kill off the police to hold their honor, while becoming murderers? They have no good choice, yet they have to choose. And, they have a charismatic, if somewhat fanatical and unstable role model. They behave as I would expect them to in such an awful situation.
Overall, this is a memorable, good film, although not great or epic. It tackles important issues in a crucible of crisis.