Joaquim-De-Almeida Movie Reviews
More Pages: Joaquim-De-Almeida Page 1 2 3


Wars Abroad, Wars At Home
A smart action thriller
Even the 'minor' actors and their characters were GREATErik North's (a top 1000 reviewer) review is pretty comprehensive in naming the actors, directors, etc. but he left out Benjamin Bratt (of Law & Order and Julia Roberts' Boy Toy fame) as the captain of the insertion team, and Raymondo Cruz as Ding.
The novel by the same name had Ding as the central character, and I was sorry that Ding had only a supporting role in the movie. However, the movie is GREAT entertainment in its own right.
Raymondo Cruz's Ding was sophisticated and touching. I especially liked his restrained satisfied expression after being selected for a mission that would let him name his own ticket afterwards.
Miguel Sandoval's performance as the ruthless drug lord, but loving family man, was nothing short of WONDERFUL. I especially liked his seamless transition from Spanish to English. Did you know that the production actually blew up that villa in which the drug lords were having a summit? Yes, they below up that nice house for for a few seconds worth of entertainment.
And why no mention of Joachim de Alameda, whose performance as the villain should have boosted his career, but didn't seem to have? His tortured expression just before killing his lover portrayed a depth of character that is a real bonus! The woman who played his lover was perfectly cast and wardrobed: spinster who is delighted and at the same time, frightened by her affair. The way Alameda phrased his lines with a credible Spanish accent was very nuanced -- a great performance.
The interleaving of formal, military funeral rites with the massacre of the insertion team was masterful -- only music and visuals, no dialog. The allusion to formal military honors also being conferred on the soldiers who were mowed down anonymously in the jungle was inspired. Such a cinematic device is more powerful than any narration or mind-numbing 'kill 'em all' sequence can deliver. Compliments to the film editor.
The integrated humor mark a new trend in action movies. Ryan asked his boozey helicopter pilot who was checking the manual and instrumentation of a newly purchasd craft "How much time do you have in this type?" The reply, after consulting his watch, was "9:30."
Donald Moffat's performance as the President could have greater dimension, and it overtly mimmicked Reagan, but that portrayal counters somewhat Clancy's accused conservative bias. A nod toward Hollywood liberalism? The whole movie, while upholding the courage and honor of American armed forces, rivals Oliver Stone in accusing the executive branch, from the president down, of corruption and betrayal. So even Lefties would find something to like about this movie.
The movie's opening sequence promises excellent action with compelling characters: the Coast Guard intercepts a hijacked private yacht and the teen-aged-looking and sounding FEMALE Coast Guard captain was commanding, and was obeyed! This movie engages the viewer on many levels: intellectual, political, visual, human, humorous and does it all entertainingly. Worth several viewings.


Wars Abroad, Wars At HomeFormer CIA analyst Jack Ryan, (Harrison Ford) is asked by his mentor and friend, Admiral Greer (James Earl Jones) to take over for him, while he battles cancer. Ryan reluctantly accepts. When a friend of the President's (Donald Moffatt) is killed, Ryan learns that a drug kingpin (Miguel Sandoval) may be responsible, for the crime. As he briefs the President, forces inside the administration, are working to take the cartel out, even without any proof. Ryan must discover the truth, about who is working against him before it's too late
The cast also includes the great Henry Czerny as Ritter, a smarmy guy at the CIA who butts heads with Ryan, Harris Yullin as the National Security Advisor, and Anne Archer returns as Cathy, Jack's wife. Directed by Philip Noyce, who also directed Patriot Games, the film stays within the framework of the book. The movie also is detailed enough to keep fans of the book happy, while at the same time it is nicely paced Ford proves once again why he's so right for roles like this. He wears his hero hat so well. It is Czerny though, that makes things really interesting for Ryan and, he gives the film an extra spark or two.
As part of the reissued "Jack Ryan" series on DVD, Clear And Present Danger, contains a retrospective featurette on how the film was made. It's pretty good and does a decent job taking you back, to what it was like on the set. The standard theatrical trailer tops off the extras. I wish there was a commentary track to go along with the other stuff--or maybe some deleted footage-that would have helped.
Still the DVD is recommended over the "movie only" edition from a few years ago
A smart action thriller
Even the 'minor' actors and their characters were GREATErik North's (a top 1000 reviewer) review is pretty comprehensive in naming the actors, directors, etc. but he left out Benjamin Bratt (of Law & Order and Julia Roberts' Boy Toy fame) as the captain of the insertion team, and Raymondo Cruz as Ding.
The novel by the same name had Ding as the central character, and I was sorry that Ding had only a supporting role in the movie. However, the movie is GREAT entertainment in its own right.
Raymondo Cruz's Ding was sophisticated and touching. I especially liked his restrained satisfied expression after being selected for a mission that would let him name his own ticket afterwards.
Miguel Sandoval's performance as the ruthless drug lord, but loving family man, was nothing short of WONDERFUL. I especially liked his seamless transition from Spanish to English. Did you know that the production actually blew up that villa in which the drug lords were having a summit? Yes, they below up that nice house for for a few seconds worth of entertainment.
And why no mention of Joachim de Alameda, whose performance as the villain should have boosted his career, but didn't seem to have? His tortured expression just before killing his lover portrayed a depth of character that is a real bonus! The woman who played his lover was perfectly cast and wardrobed: spinster who is delighted and at the same time, frightened by her affair. The way Alameda phrased his lines with a credible Spanish accent was very nuanced -- a great performance.
The interleaving of formal, military funeral rites with the massacre of the insertion team was masterful -- only music and visuals, no dialog. The allusion to formal military honors also being conferred on the soldiers who were mowed down anonymously in the jungle was inspired. Such a cinematic device is more powerful than any narration or mind-numbing 'kill 'em all' sequence can deliver. Compliments to the film editor.
The integrated humor mark a new trend in action movies. Ryan asked his boozey helicopter pilot who was checking the manual and instrumentation of a newly purchasd craft "How much time do you have in this type?" The reply, after consulting his watch, was "9:30."
Donald Moffat's performance as the President could have greater dimension, and it overtly mimmicked Reagan, but that portrayal counters somewhat Clancy's accused conservative bias. A nod toward Hollywood liberalism? The whole movie, while upholding the courage and honor of American armed forces, rivals Oliver Stone in accusing the executive branch, from the president down, of corruption and betrayal. So even Lefties would find something to like about this movie.
The movie's opening sequence promises excellent action with compelling characters: the Coast Guard intercepts a hijacked private yacht and the teen-aged-looking and sounding FEMALE Coast Guard captain was commanding, and was obeyed! This movie engages the viewer on many levels: intellectual, political, visual, human, humorous and does it all entertainingly. Worth several viewings.


Wars Abroad, Wars At HomeFormer CIA analyst Jack Ryan, (Harrison Ford) is asked by his mentor and friend, Admiral Greer (James Earl Jones) to take over for him, while he battles cancer. Ryan reluctantly accepts. When a friend of the President's (Donald Moffatt) is killed, Ryan learns that a drug kingpin (Miguel Sandoval) may be responsible, for the crime. As he briefs the President, forces inside the administration, are working to take the cartel out, even without any proof. Ryan must discover the truth, about who is working against him before it's too late
The cast also includes the great Henry Czerny as Ritter, a smarmy guy at the CIA who butts heads with Ryan, Harris Yullin as the National Security Advisor, and Anne Archer returns as Cathy, Jack's wife. Directed by Philip Noyce, who also directed Patriot Games, the film stays within the framework of the book. The movie also is detailed enough to keep fans of the book happy, while at the same time it is nicely paced Ford proves once again why he's so right for roles like this. He wears his hero hat so well. It is Czerny though, that makes things really interesting for Ryan and, he gives the film an extra spark or two.
As part of the reissued "Jack Ryan" series on DVD, Clear And Present Danger, contains a retrospective featurette on how the film was made. It's pretty good and does a decent job taking you back, to what it was like on the set. The standard theatrical trailer tops off the extras. I wish there was a commentary track to go along with the other stuff--or maybe some deleted footage-that would have helped.
Still the DVD is recommended over the "movie only" edition from a few years ago
A smart action thriller
Even the 'minor' actors and their characters were GREATErik North's (a top 1000 reviewer) review is pretty comprehensive in naming the actors, directors, etc. but he left out Benjamin Bratt (of Law & Order and Julia Roberts' Boy Toy fame) as the captain of the insertion team, and Raymondo Cruz as Ding.
The novel by the same name had Ding as the central character, and I was sorry that Ding had only a supporting role in the movie. However, the movie is GREAT entertainment in its own right.
Raymondo Cruz's Ding was sophisticated and touching. I especially liked his restrained satisfied expression after being selected for a mission that would let him name his own ticket afterwards.
Miguel Sandoval's performance as the ruthless drug lord, but loving family man, was nothing short of WONDERFUL. I especially liked his seamless transition from Spanish to English. Did you know that the production actually blew up that villa in which the drug lords were having a summit? Yes, they below up that nice house for for a few seconds worth of entertainment.
And why no mention of Joachim de Alameda, whose performance as the villain should have boosted his career, but didn't seem to have? His tortured expression just before killing his lover portrayed a depth of character that is a real bonus! The woman who played his lover was perfectly cast and wardrobed: spinster who is delighted and at the same time, frightened by her affair. The way Alameda phrased his lines with a credible Spanish accent was very nuanced -- a great performance.
The interleaving of formal, military funeral rites with the massacre of the insertion team was masterful -- only music and visuals, no dialog. The allusion to formal military honors also being conferred on the soldiers who were mowed down anonymously in the jungle was inspired. Such a cinematic device is more powerful than any narration or mind-numbing 'kill 'em all' sequence can deliver. Compliments to the film editor.
The integrated humor mark a new trend in action movies. Ryan asked his boozey helicopter pilot who was checking the manual and instrumentation of a newly purchasd craft "How much time do you have in this type?" The reply, after consulting his watch, was "9:30."
Donald Moffat's performance as the President could have greater dimension, and it overtly mimmicked Reagan, but that portrayal counters somewhat Clancy's accused conservative bias. A nod toward Hollywood liberalism? The whole movie, while upholding the courage and honor of American armed forces, rivals Oliver Stone in accusing the executive branch, from the president down, of corruption and betrayal. So even Lefties would find something to like about this movie.
The movie's opening sequence promises excellent action with compelling characters: the Coast Guard intercepts a hijacked private yacht and the teen-aged-looking and sounding FEMALE Coast Guard captain was commanding, and was obeyed! This movie engages the viewer on many levels: intellectual, political, visual, human, humorous and does it all entertainingly. Worth several viewings.


Bravo.
The fencing master - a plot in Madrid in the 1860s

Good Action, Solid StoryOn a Christmas Day routine recon flight over Bosnia, Navy pilot Stackhouse (Gabriel Macht), and his navigator, Chris Burnett (Owen Wilson), notice some activity in one of the "demilitarized" zones (which also happens to be a "no-flight" zone), and summarily take it upon themselves to investigate. Their efforts immediately cause more than a little consternation in certain quarters, however, and very quickly their mission goes south with dire results. Having seen (and photographed, no less) things not meant for their eyes, they find themselves on the wrong end of hostile missile, and their plane goes down.
Having ejected in time, Burnett finds himself on the ground, alone, and in hostile territory. He manages to call in his position, but due to the muddled and convoluted politics of the moment, Admiral Leslie Reigart (Gene Hackman) is prevented from sending help in straight away, which leaves Burnett for a time to his own devices for survival in unknown terrain while in harm's way. But Burnett, a seven year veteran, is determined to make it, and to make this mission mean something-- which it will, if only he can get the proof of what he's seen back safely. And that means beating the enemy at their own game, and on their turf.
Initially, Moore's film seems destined to become just one more of the brutally realistic and action packed war stories that have evolved since Spielberg's "Ryan," albeit a good one, from all indications early on. The story is solid and there's plenty of action, all of which is carried off nicely by star Owen Wilson, but by the half-way point there's nothing much that sets it apart from the usual action/drama survival film. It plays out, in fact, like a cross between "Enemy At the Gates" and "Black Hawk Down." Then something happens-- and it takes a turn that kicks it up a notch and takes it beyond anything those other films offered and/or delivered.
Once the action surrounding Burnett's dilemma is established, Moore sharpens his focus on the more personal aspects of the story, and it suddenly becomes more than just a quest for survival; it becomes the study of a man on a mission, a man with a goal and a purpose, an individual against whom the odds are decidedly stacked. And by infusing that decisive human element into the story, it elevates the film to a higher level and achieves the kind of success never realized by either of the aforementioned films, in part because of their failure to effect that very same level of human drama that sets this film apart.
As Burnett, Owen Wilson is very effective, turning in a performance that is quite natural and affecting. Wilson has something of a quirky appearance and a rather mesmerizing tone and manner of speaking that gives him a charismatic screen presence and makes him extremely accessible and convincing. He manages to avoid the trappings of the stereotypical "fly-boy" character, checking his ego and machismo at the door, and it makes Burnett very real and believable. It also makes the development of his character-- his actions, reactions and attitudes-- convincing as the story progresses, as well as lending credibility to the overall film.
Hackman, on the other hand, falls directly into stereotype with his portrayal of Reigart; this is a character we've seen time and time again in just about every war film to come down the pike. But to his credit, Hackman does it extremely well, which is the beauty of watching an actor of his caliber perform. He's the consummate professional, and even when covering familiar ground, he has the ability to make it seem fresh and, most importantly, entertaining. Hackman is a gifted actor with a tremendous range; this character-- by it's inherent nature-- simply has nothing to offer by way of a challenge. Reigart is merely a character that serves a purpose, and Hackman realizes that intent to the fullest.
The supporting cast includes Charles Mark Whitfield (Rodway), Joaquim de Almeida (Piquet), David Keith (O'Malley), Olek Krupa (Lokar), Vladimir Mashkov (Tracker) and Marko Igonda (Bazda). A film that offers some insights into politics, as well as the human condition, it manages to be thought provoking while delivering some terrific action, drama and solid entertainment. Worthy to be called one of "Ryan's " more successful offspring, "Behind Enemy Lines" is the watermelon of war films; it takes some doing to get through the rind, but once you get to the good part, it's pretty sweet, and more than worth the effort. And that's the magic of the movies.
BlandBasically, the flight sequence is probably the coolest air scene ever in a movie. Top Gun can't even compete really. The fireball is hokey, but overall the sequence is done pretty well. The rest of the movie is boring. Nothing to do with flying at all. It's one man versus an entire army, and guess who wins? It's a good old patriotism movie (This movie came out like a few months after 9/11, if I remember correctly).
This will put you on the edge of your seat!navigator Lt. Burnett (Own Wilson) and pilot Stackhouse (Gabriel Macht) are on their
last reconnaissance mission in their F-A18 Super Hornet fighter jet. It's Christmas day,
and the airmen are taking photographs over the Bosnia region when they pick up an
unidentified signal on their radar. They decide to venture off into the "no fly zone"
without knowing that all hell would soon break loose.
Sit down Top Gun. All I can say about Behind Enemy Lines is WOW! My jaw was on
the floor during the opening scene and the first thirty minutes. The special affects blew me
away watching the fighter jet try to avoid the heat seeking Surface to Air Missiles. Behind
Enemy Lines is pure fun and entertainment.
A well known cast including Gene Hackman fill the roles of Navy officers who find
themselves battling the enemy and higher command. Hackman, who plays a hard headed
Admiral is trying to bring home the pilots who were shot down on their mission. I have to
say that Owen probably wasn't the best pick for the lead role. His history of comedies
made him even less convincing, but mediocre acting didn't take away from intensity of the
movie, however it was probably bad enough to be scorned by the critics and ultimately not
make it as one of the best films this year. Regardless, I can't wait to add this to movie to
my collection.
Director John Moore is a wicked man who uses several unique approaches to Behind
Enemy Lines. Every gruesome scene reappears again somewhere in the form of a
flashback. There are several panning shots, and he even freezes the frame entirely at the
most climatic part of a particular scene. His aggressive approach may irritate some, but I
enthusiastically enjoyed it. It coincided with the dramatic aspects, and added to the
seriousness to Owen's role. Several closeups of actors and weapons bring you close to the
action.
Despite all the action and suspense, Behind Enemy Lines is not ruined by a usually ignored
plot. While often you'll think to yourself that one person could never survive some of the
things these characters went through, but for the most part Enemy Lines is believable.
The music was loud, especially the suspense trumpet noises that happen in every scene do
exaggerate the movie, while a pumped up soundtrack keeps the pace quick at the same
time.
You'll enjoy Behind Enemy Lines. The fighting scenes are graphic and provides the
audience with an overall good time. It's better than Spy Games, and probably the best
movie this year so far in respect to the action genre.


Good Action, Solid StoryOn a Christmas Day routine recon flight over Bosnia, Navy pilot Stackhouse (Gabriel Macht), and his navigator, Chris Burnett (Owen Wilson), notice some activity in one of the "demilitarized" zones (which also happens to be a "no-flight" zone), and summarily take it upon themselves to investigate. Their efforts immediately cause more than a little consternation in certain quarters, however, and very quickly their mission goes south with dire results. Having seen (and photographed, no less) things not meant for their eyes, they find themselves on the wrong end of hostile missile, and their plane goes down.
Having ejected in time, Burnett finds himself on the ground, alone, and in hostile territory. He manages to call in his position, but due to the muddled and convoluted politics of the moment, Admiral Leslie Reigart (Gene Hackman) is prevented from sending help in straight away, which leaves Burnett for a time to his own devices for survival in unknown terrain while in harm's way. But Burnett, a seven year veteran, is determined to make it, and to make this mission mean something-- which it will, if only he can get the proof of what he's seen back safely. And that means beating the enemy at their own game, and on their turf.
Initially, Moore's film seems destined to become just one more of the brutally realistic and action packed war stories that have evolved since Spielberg's "Ryan," albeit a good one, from all indications early on. The story is solid and there's plenty of action, all of which is carried off nicely by star Owen Wilson, but by the half-way point there's nothing much that sets it apart from the usual action/drama survival film. It plays out, in fact, like a cross between "Enemy At the Gates" and "Black Hawk Down." Then something happens-- and it takes a turn that kicks it up a notch and takes it beyond anything those other films offered and/or delivered.
Once the action surrounding Burnett's dilemma is established, Moore sharpens his focus on the more personal aspects of the story, and it suddenly becomes more than just a quest for survival; it becomes the study of a man on a mission, a man with a goal and a purpose, an individual against whom the odds are decidedly stacked. And by infusing that decisive human element into the story, it elevates the film to a higher level and achieves the kind of success never realized by either of the aforementioned films, in part because of their failure to effect that very same level of human drama that sets this film apart.
As Burnett, Owen Wilson is very effective, turning in a performance that is quite natural and affecting. Wilson has something of a quirky appearance and a rather mesmerizing tone and manner of speaking that gives him a charismatic screen presence and makes him extremely accessible and convincing. He manages to avoid the trappings of the stereotypical "fly-boy" character, checking his ego and machismo at the door, and it makes Burnett very real and believable. It also makes the development of his character-- his actions, reactions and attitudes-- convincing as the story progresses, as well as lending credibility to the overall film.
Hackman, on the other hand, falls directly into stereotype with his portrayal of Reigart; this is a character we've seen time and time again in just about every war film to come down the pike. But to his credit, Hackman does it extremely well, which is the beauty of watching an actor of his caliber perform. He's the consummate professional, and even when covering familiar ground, he has the ability to make it seem fresh and, most importantly, entertaining. Hackman is a gifted actor with a tremendous range; this character-- by it's inherent nature-- simply has nothing to offer by way of a challenge. Reigart is merely a character that serves a purpose, and Hackman realizes that intent to the fullest.
The supporting cast includes Charles Mark Whitfield (Rodway), Joaquim de Almeida (Piquet), David Keith (O'Malley), Olek Krupa (Lokar), Vladimir Mashkov (Tracker) and Marko Igonda (Bazda). A film that offers some insights into politics, as well as the human condition, it manages to be thought provoking while delivering some terrific action, drama and solid entertainment. Worthy to be called one of "Ryan's " more successful offspring, "Behind Enemy Lines" is the watermelon of war films; it takes some doing to get through the rind, but once you get to the good part, it's pretty sweet, and more than worth the effort. And that's the magic of the movies.
BlandBasically, the flight sequence is probably the coolest air scene ever in a movie. Top Gun can't even compete really. The fireball is hokey, but overall the sequence is done pretty well. The rest of the movie is boring. Nothing to do with flying at all. It's one man versus an entire army, and guess who wins? It's a good old patriotism movie (This movie came out like a few months after 9/11, if I remember correctly).
This will put you on the edge of your seat!navigator Lt. Burnett (Own Wilson) and pilot Stackhouse (Gabriel Macht) are on their
last reconnaissance mission in their F-A18 Super Hornet fighter jet. It's Christmas day,
and the airmen are taking photographs over the Bosnia region when they pick up an
unidentified signal on their radar. They decide to venture off into the "no fly zone"
without knowing that all hell would soon break loose.
Sit down Top Gun. All I can say about Behind Enemy Lines is WOW! My jaw was on
the floor during the opening scene and the first thirty minutes. The special affects blew me
away watching the fighter jet try to avoid the heat seeking Surface to Air Missiles. Behind
Enemy Lines is pure fun and entertainment.
A well known cast including Gene Hackman fill the roles of Navy officers who find
themselves battling the enemy and higher command. Hackman, who plays a hard headed
Admiral is trying to bring home the pilots who were shot down on their mission. I have to
say that Owen probably wasn't the best pick for the lead role. His history of comedies
made him even less convincing, but mediocre acting didn't take away from intensity of the
movie, however it was probably bad enough to be scorned by the critics and ultimately not
make it as one of the best films this year. Regardless, I can't wait to add this to movie to
my collection.
Director John Moore is a wicked man who uses several unique approaches to Behind
Enemy Lines. Every gruesome scene reappears again somewhere in the form of a
flashback. There are several panning shots, and he even freezes the frame entirely at the
most climatic part of a particular scene. His aggressive approach may irritate some, but I
enthusiastically enjoyed it. It coincided with the dramatic aspects, and added to the
seriousness to Owen's role. Several closeups of actors and weapons bring you close to the
action.
Despite all the action and suspense, Behind Enemy Lines is not ruined by a usually ignored
plot. While often you'll think to yourself that one person could never survive some of the
things these characters went through, but for the most part Enemy Lines is believable.
The music was loud, especially the suspense trumpet noises that happen in every scene do
exaggerate the movie, while a pumped up soundtrack keeps the pace quick at the same
time.
You'll enjoy Behind Enemy Lines. The fighting scenes are graphic and provides the
audience with an overall good time. It's better than Spy Games, and probably the best
movie this year so far in respect to the action genre.


Good Action, Solid StoryOn a Christmas Day routine recon flight over Bosnia, Navy pilot Stackhouse (Gabriel Macht), and his navigator, Chris Burnett (Owen Wilson), notice some activity in one of the "demilitarized" zones (which also happens to be a "no-flight" zone), and summarily take it upon themselves to investigate. Their efforts immediately cause more than a little consternation in certain quarters, however, and very quickly their mission goes south with dire results. Having seen (and photographed, no less) things not meant for their eyes, they find themselves on the wrong end of hostile missile, and their plane goes down.
Having ejected in time, Burnett finds himself on the ground, alone, and in hostile territory. He manages to call in his position, but due to the muddled and convoluted politics of the moment, Admiral Leslie Reigart (Gene Hackman) is prevented from sending help in straight away, which leaves Burnett for a time to his own devices for survival in unknown terrain while in harm's way. But Burnett, a seven year veteran, is determined to make it, and to make this mission mean something-- which it will, if only he can get the proof of what he's seen back safely. And that means beating the enemy at their own game, and on their turf.
Initially, Moore's film seems destined to become just one more of the brutally realistic and action packed war stories that have evolved since Spielberg's "Ryan," albeit a good one, from all indications early on. The story is solid and there's plenty of action, all of which is carried off nicely by star Owen Wilson, but by the half-way point there's nothing much that sets it apart from the usual action/drama survival film. It plays out, in fact, like a cross between "Enemy At the Gates" and "Black Hawk Down." Then something happens-- and it takes a turn that kicks it up a notch and takes it beyond anything those other films offered and/or delivered.
Once the action surrounding Burnett's dilemma is established, Moore sharpens his focus on the more personal aspects of the story, and it suddenly becomes more than just a quest for survival; it becomes the study of a man on a mission, a man with a goal and a purpose, an individual against whom the odds are decidedly stacked. And by infusing that decisive human element into the story, it elevates the film to a higher level and achieves the kind of success never realized by either of the aforementioned films, in part because of their failure to effect that very same level of human drama that sets this film apart.
As Burnett, Owen Wilson is very effective, turning in a performance that is quite natural and affecting. Wilson has something of a quirky appearance and a rather mesmerizing tone and manner of speaking that gives him a charismatic screen presence and makes him extremely accessible and convincing. He manages to avoid the trappings of the stereotypical "fly-boy" character, checking his ego and machismo at the door, and it makes Burnett very real and believable. It also makes the development of his character-- his actions, reactions and attitudes-- convincing as the story progresses, as well as lending credibility to the overall film.
Hackman, on the other hand, falls directly into stereotype with his portrayal of Reigart; this is a character we've seen time and time again in just about every war film to come down the pike. But to his credit, Hackman does it extremely well, which is the beauty of watching an actor of his caliber perform. He's the consummate professional, and even when covering familiar ground, he has the ability to make it seem fresh and, most importantly, entertaining. Hackman is a gifted actor with a tremendous range; this character-- by it's inherent nature-- simply has nothing to offer by way of a challenge. Reigart is merely a character that serves a purpose, and Hackman realizes that intent to the fullest.
The supporting cast includes Charles Mark Whitfield (Rodway), Joaquim de Almeida (Piquet), David Keith (O'Malley), Olek Krupa (Lokar), Vladimir Mashkov (Tracker) and Marko Igonda (Bazda). A film that offers some insights into politics, as well as the human condition, it manages to be thought provoking while delivering some terrific action, drama and solid entertainment. Worthy to be called one of "Ryan's " more successful offspring, "Behind Enemy Lines" is the watermelon of war films; it takes some doing to get through the rind, but once you get to the good part, it's pretty sweet, and more than worth the effort. And that's the magic of the movies.
BlandBasically, the flight sequence is probably the coolest air scene ever in a movie. Top Gun can't even compete really. The fireball is hokey, but overall the sequence is done pretty well. The rest of the movie is boring. Nothing to do with flying at all. It's one man versus an entire army, and guess who wins? It's a good old patriotism movie (This movie came out like a few months after 9/11, if I remember correctly).
This will put you on the edge of your seat!navigator Lt. Burnett (Own Wilson) and pilot Stackhouse (Gabriel Macht) are on their
last reconnaissance mission in their F-A18 Super Hornet fighter jet. It's Christmas day,
and the airmen are taking photographs over the Bosnia region when they pick up an
unidentified signal on their radar. They decide to venture off into the "no fly zone"
without knowing that all hell would soon break loose.
Sit down Top Gun. All I can say about Behind Enemy Lines is WOW! My jaw was on
the floor during the opening scene and the first thirty minutes. The special affects blew me
away watching the fighter jet try to avoid the heat seeking Surface to Air Missiles. Behind
Enemy Lines is pure fun and entertainment.
A well known cast including Gene Hackman fill the roles of Navy officers who find
themselves battling the enemy and higher command. Hackman, who plays a hard headed
Admiral is trying to bring home the pilots who were shot down on their mission. I have to
say that Owen probably wasn't the best pick for the lead role. His history of comedies
made him even less convincing, but mediocre acting didn't take away from intensity of the
movie, however it was probably bad enough to be scorned by the critics and ultimately not
make it as one of the best films this year. Regardless, I can't wait to add this to movie to
my collection.
Director John Moore is a wicked man who uses several unique approaches to Behind
Enemy Lines. Every gruesome scene reappears again somewhere in the form of a
flashback. There are several panning shots, and he even freezes the frame entirely at the
most climatic part of a particular scene. His aggressive approach may irritate some, but I
enthusiastically enjoyed it. It coincided with the dramatic aspects, and added to the
seriousness to Owen's role. Several closeups of actors and weapons bring you close to the
action.
Despite all the action and suspense, Behind Enemy Lines is not ruined by a usually ignored
plot. While often you'll think to yourself that one person could never survive some of the
things these characters went through, but for the most part Enemy Lines is believable.
The music was loud, especially the suspense trumpet noises that happen in every scene do
exaggerate the movie, while a pumped up soundtrack keeps the pace quick at the same
time.
You'll enjoy Behind Enemy Lines. The fighting scenes are graphic and provides the
audience with an overall good time. It's better than Spy Games, and probably the best
movie this year so far in respect to the action genre.


Good Action, Solid StoryOn a Christmas Day routine recon flight over Bosnia, Navy pilot Stackhouse (Gabriel Macht), and his navigator, Chris Burnett (Owen Wilson), notice some activity in one of the "demilitarized" zones (which also happens to be a "no-flight" zone), and summarily take it upon themselves to investigate. Their efforts immediately cause more than a little consternation in certain quarters, however, and very quickly their mission goes south with dire results. Having seen (and photographed, no less) things not meant for their eyes, they find themselves on the wrong end of hostile missile, and their plane goes down.
Having ejected in time, Burnett finds himself on the ground, alone, and in hostile territory. He manages to call in his position, but due to the muddled and convoluted politics of the moment, Admiral Leslie Reigart (Gene Hackman) is prevented from sending help in straight away, which leaves Burnett for a time to his own devices for survival in unknown terrain while in harm's way. But Burnett, a seven year veteran, is determined to make it, and to make this mission mean something-- which it will, if only he can get the proof of what he's seen back safely. And that means beating the enemy at their own game, and on their turf.
Initially, Moore's film seems destined to become just one more of the brutally realistic and action packed war stories that have evolved since Spielberg's "Ryan," albeit a good one, from all indications early on. The story is solid and there's plenty of action, all of which is carried off nicely by star Owen Wilson, but by the half-way point there's nothing much that sets it apart from the usual action/drama survival film. It plays out, in fact, like a cross between "Enemy At the Gates" and "Black Hawk Down." Then something happens-- and it takes a turn that kicks it up a notch and takes it beyond anything those other films offered and/or delivered.
Once the action surrounding Burnett's dilemma is established, Moore sharpens his focus on the more personal aspects of the story, and it suddenly becomes more than just a quest for survival; it becomes the study of a man on a mission, a man with a goal and a purpose, an individual against whom the odds are decidedly stacked. And by infusing that decisive human element into the story, it elevates the film to a higher level and achieves the kind of success never realized by either of the aforementioned films, in part because of their failure to effect that very same level of human drama that sets this film apart.
As Burnett, Owen Wilson is very effective, turning in a performance that is quite natural and affecting. Wilson has something of a quirky appearance and a rather mesmerizing tone and manner of speaking that gives him a charismatic screen presence and makes him extremely accessible and convincing. He manages to avoid the trappings of the stereotypical "fly-boy" character, checking his ego and machismo at the door, and it makes Burnett very real and believable. It also makes the development of his character-- his actions, reactions and attitudes-- convincing as the story progresses, as well as lending credibility to the overall film.
Hackman, on the other hand, falls directly into stereotype with his portrayal of Reigart; this is a character we've seen time and time again in just about every war film to come down the pike. But to his credit, Hackman does it extremely well, which is the beauty of watching an actor of his caliber perform. He's the consummate professional, and even when covering familiar ground, he has the ability to make it seem fresh and, most importantly, entertaining. Hackman is a gifted actor with a tremendous range; this character-- by it's inherent nature-- simply has nothing to offer by way of a challenge. Reigart is merely a character that serves a purpose, and Hackman realizes that intent to the fullest.
The supporting cast includes Charles Mark Whitfield (Rodway), Joaquim de Almeida (Piquet), David Keith (O'Malley), Olek Krupa (Lokar), Vladimir Mashkov (Tracker) and Marko Igonda (Bazda). A film that offers some insights into politics, as well as the human condition, it manages to be thought provoking while delivering some terrific action, drama and solid entertainment. Worthy to be called one of "Ryan's " more successful offspring, "Behind Enemy Lines" is the watermelon of war films; it takes some doing to get through the rind, but once you get to the good part, it's pretty sweet, and more than worth the effort. And that's the magic of the movies.
BlandBasically, the flight sequence is probably the coolest air scene ever in a movie. Top Gun can't even compete really. The fireball is hokey, but overall the sequence is done pretty well. The rest of the movie is boring. Nothing to do with flying at all. It's one man versus an entire army, and guess who wins? It's a good old patriotism movie (This movie came out like a few months after 9/11, if I remember correctly).
This will put you on the edge of your seat!navigator Lt. Burnett (Own Wilson) and pilot Stackhouse (Gabriel Macht) are on their
last reconnaissance mission in their F-A18 Super Hornet fighter jet. It's Christmas day,
and the airmen are taking photographs over the Bosnia region when they pick up an
unidentified signal on their radar. They decide to venture off into the "no fly zone"
without knowing that all hell would soon break loose.
Sit down Top Gun. All I can say about Behind Enemy Lines is WOW! My jaw was on
the floor during the opening scene and the first thirty minutes. The special affects blew me
away watching the fighter jet try to avoid the heat seeking Surface to Air Missiles. Behind
Enemy Lines is pure fun and entertainment.
A well known cast including Gene Hackman fill the roles of Navy officers who find
themselves battling the enemy and higher command. Hackman, who plays a hard headed
Admiral is trying to bring home the pilots who were shot down on their mission. I have to
say that Owen probably wasn't the best pick for the lead role. His history of comedies
made him even less convincing, but mediocre acting didn't take away from intensity of the
movie, however it was probably bad enough to be scorned by the critics and ultimately not
make it as one of the best films this year. Regardless, I can't wait to add this to movie to
my collection.
Director John Moore is a wicked man who uses several unique approaches to Behind
Enemy Lines. Every gruesome scene reappears again somewhere in the form of a
flashback. There are several panning shots, and he even freezes the frame entirely at the
most climatic part of a particular scene. His aggressive approach may irritate some, but I
enthusiastically enjoyed it. It coincided with the dramatic aspects, and added to the
seriousness to Owen's role. Several closeups of actors and weapons bring you close to the
action.
Despite all the action and suspense, Behind Enemy Lines is not ruined by a usually ignored
plot. While often you'll think to yourself that one person could never survive some of the
things these characters went through, but for the most part Enemy Lines is believable.
The music was loud, especially the suspense trumpet noises that happen in every scene do
exaggerate the movie, while a pumped up soundtrack keeps the pace quick at the same
time.
You'll enjoy Behind Enemy Lines. The fighting scenes are graphic and provides the
audience with an overall good time. It's better than Spy Games, and probably the best
movie this year so far in respect to the action genre.


Good Action, Solid StoryOn a Christmas Day routine recon flight over Bosnia, Navy pilot Stackhouse (Gabriel Macht), and his navigator, Chris Burnett (Owen Wilson), notice some activity in one of the "demilitarized" zones (which also happens to be a "no-flight" zone), and summarily take it upon themselves to investigate. Their efforts immediately cause more than a little consternation in certain quarters, however, and very quickly their mission goes south with dire results. Having seen (and photographed, no less) things not meant for their eyes, they find themselves on the wrong end of hostile missile, and their plane goes down.
Having ejected in time, Burnett finds himself on the ground, alone, and in hostile territory. He manages to call in his position, but due to the muddled and convoluted politics of the moment, Admiral Leslie Reigart (Gene Hackman) is prevented from sending help in straight away, which leaves Burnett for a time to his own devices for survival in unknown terrain while in harm's way. But Burnett, a seven year veteran, is determined to make it, and to make this mission mean something-- which it will, if only he can get the proof of what he's seen back safely. And that means beating the enemy at their own game, and on their turf.
Initially, Moore's film seems destined to become just one more of the brutally realistic and action packed war stories that have evolved since Spielberg's "Ryan," albeit a good one, from all indications early on. The story is solid and there's plenty of action, all of which is carried off nicely by star Owen Wilson, but by the half-way point there's nothing much that sets it apart from the usual action/drama survival film. It plays out, in fact, like a cross between "Enemy At the Gates" and "Black Hawk Down." Then something happens-- and it takes a turn that kicks it up a notch and takes it beyond anything those other films offered and/or delivered.
Once the action surrounding Burnett's dilemma is established, Moore sharpens his focus on the more personal aspects of the story, and it suddenly becomes more than just a quest for survival; it becomes the study of a man on a mission, a man with a goal and a purpose, an individual against whom the odds are decidedly stacked. And by infusing that decisive human element into the story, it elevates the film to a higher level and achieves the kind of success never realized by either of the aforementioned films, in part because of their failure to effect that very same level of human drama that sets this film apart.
As Burnett, Owen Wilson is very effective, turning in a performance that is quite natural and affecting. Wilson has something of a quirky appearance and a rather mesmerizing tone and manner of speaking that gives him a charismatic screen presence and makes him extremely accessible and convincing. He manages to avoid the trappings of the stereotypical "fly-boy" character, checking his ego and machismo at the door, and it makes Burnett very real and believable. It also makes the development of his character-- his actions, reactions and attitudes-- convincing as the story progresses, as well as lending credibility to the overall film.
Hackman, on the other hand, falls directly into stereotype with his portrayal of Reigart; this is a character we've seen time and time again in just about every war film to come down the pike. But to his credit, Hackman does it extremely well, which is the beauty of watching an actor of his caliber perform. He's the consummate professional, and even when covering familiar ground, he has the ability to make it seem fresh and, most importantly, entertaining. Hackman is a gifted actor with a tremendous range; this character-- by it's inherent nature-- simply has nothing to offer by way of a challenge. Reigart is merely a character that serves a purpose, and Hackman realizes that intent to the fullest.
The supporting cast includes Charles Mark Whitfield (Rodway), Joaquim de Almeida (Piquet), David Keith (O'Malley), Olek Krupa (Lokar), Vladimir Mashkov (Tracker) and Marko Igonda (Bazda). A film that offers some insights into politics, as well as the human condition, it manages to be thought provoking while delivering some terrific action, drama and solid entertainment. Worthy to be called one of "Ryan's " more successful offspring, "Behind Enemy Lines" is the watermelon of war films; it takes some doing to get through the rind, but once you get to the good part, it's pretty sweet, and more than worth the effort. And that's the magic of the movies.
BlandBasically, the flight sequence is probably the coolest air scene ever in a movie. Top Gun can't even compete really. The fireball is hokey, but overall the sequence is done pretty well. The rest of the movie is boring. Nothing to do with flying at all. It's one man versus an entire army, and guess who wins? It's a good old patriotism movie (This movie came out like a few months after 9/11, if I remember correctly).
This will put you on the edge of your seat!navigator Lt. Burnett (Own Wilson) and pilot Stackhouse (Gabriel Macht) are on their
last reconnaissance mission in their F-A18 Super Hornet fighter jet. It's Christmas day,
and the airmen are taking photographs over the Bosnia region when they pick up an
unidentified signal on their radar. They decide to venture off into the "no fly zone"
without knowing that all hell would soon break loose.
Sit down Top Gun. All I can say about Behind Enemy Lines is WOW! My jaw was on
the floor during the opening scene and the first thirty minutes. The special affects blew me
away watching the fighter jet try to avoid the heat seeking Surface to Air Missiles. Behind
Enemy Lines is pure fun and entertainment.
A well known cast including Gene Hackman fill the roles of Navy officers who find
themselves battling the enemy and higher command. Hackman, who plays a hard headed
Admiral is trying to bring home the pilots who were shot down on their mission. I have to
say that Owen probably wasn't the best pick for the lead role. His history of comedies
made him even less convincing, but mediocre acting didn't take away from intensity of the
movie, however it was probably bad enough to be scorned by the critics and ultimately not
make it as one of the best films this year. Regardless, I can't wait to add this to movie to
my collection.
Director John Moore is a wicked man who uses several unique approaches to Behind
Enemy Lines. Every gruesome scene reappears again somewhere in the form of a
flashback. There are several panning shots, and he even freezes the frame entirely at the
most climatic part of a particular scene. His aggressive approach may irritate some, but I
enthusiastically enjoyed it. It coincided with the dramatic aspects, and added to the
seriousness to Owen's role. Several closeups of actors and weapons bring you close to the
action.
Despite all the action and suspense, Behind Enemy Lines is not ruined by a usually ignored
plot. While often you'll think to yourself that one person could never survive some of the
things these characters went through, but for the most part Enemy Lines is believable.
The music was loud, especially the suspense trumpet noises that happen in every scene do
exaggerate the movie, while a pumped up soundtrack keeps the pace quick at the same
time.
You'll enjoy Behind Enemy Lines. The fighting scenes are graphic and provides the
audience with an overall good time. It's better than Spy Games, and probably the best
movie this year so far in respect to the action genre.


Good Action, Solid StoryOn a Christmas Day routine recon flight over Bosnia, Navy pilot Stackhouse (Gabriel Macht), and his navigator, Chris Burnett (Owen Wilson), notice some activity in one of the "demilitarized" zones (which also happens to be a "no-flight" zone), and summarily take it upon themselves to investigate. Their efforts immediately cause more than a little consternation in certain quarters, however, and very quickly their mission goes south with dire results. Having seen (and photographed, no less) things not meant for their eyes, they find themselves on the wrong end of hostile missile, and their plane goes down.
Having ejected in time, Burnett finds himself on the ground, alone, and in hostile territory. He manages to call in his position, but due to the muddled and convoluted politics of the moment, Admiral Leslie Reigart (Gene Hackman) is prevented from sending help in straight away, which leaves Burnett for a time to his own devices for survival in unknown terrain while in harm's way. But Burnett, a seven year veteran, is determined to make it, and to make this mission mean something-- which it will, if only he can get the proof of what he's seen back safely. And that means beating the enemy at their own game, and on their turf.
Initially, Moore's film seems destined to become just one more of the brutally realistic and action packed war stories that have evolved since Spielberg's "Ryan," albeit a good one, from all indications early on. The story is solid and there's plenty of action, all of which is carried off nicely by star Owen Wilson, but by the half-way point there's nothing much that sets it apart from the usual action/drama survival film. It plays out, in fact, like a cross between "Enemy At the Gates" and "Black Hawk Down." Then something happens-- and it takes a turn that kicks it up a notch and takes it beyond anything those other films offered and/or delivered.
Once the action surrounding Burnett's dilemma is established, Moore sharpens his focus on the more personal aspects of the story, and it suddenly becomes more than just a quest for survival; it becomes the study of a man on a mission, a man with a goal and a purpose, an individual against whom the odds are decidedly stacked. And by infusing that decisive human element into the story, it elevates the film to a higher level and achieves the kind of success never realized by either of the aforementioned films, in part because of their failure to effect that very same level of human drama that sets this film apart.
As Burnett, Owen Wilson is very effective, turning in a performance that is quite natural and affecting. Wilson has something of a quirky appearance and a rather mesmerizing tone and manner of speaking that gives him a charismatic screen presence and makes him extremely accessible and convincing. He manages to avoid the trappings of the stereotypical "fly-boy" character, checking his ego and machismo at the door, and it makes Burnett very real and believable. It also makes the development of his character-- his actions, reactions and attitudes-- convincing as the story progresses, as well as lending credibility to the overall film.
Hackman, on the other hand, falls directly into stereotype with his portrayal of Reigart; this is a character we've seen time and time again in just about every war film to come down the pike. But to his credit, Hackman does it extremely well, which is the beauty of watching an actor of his caliber perform. He's the consummate professional, and even when covering familiar ground, he has the ability to make it seem fresh and, most importantly, entertaining. Hackman is a gifted actor with a tremendous range; this character-- by it's inherent nature-- simply has nothing to offer by way of a challenge. Reigart is merely a character that serves a purpose, and Hackman realizes that intent to the fullest.
The supporting cast includes Charles Mark Whitfield (Rodway), Joaquim de Almeida (Piquet), David Keith (O'Malley), Olek Krupa (Lokar), Vladimir Mashkov (Tracker) and Marko Igonda (Bazda). A film that offers some insights into politics, as well as the human condition, it manages to be thought provoking while delivering some terrific action, drama and solid entertainment. Worthy to be called one of "Ryan's " more successful offspring, "Behind Enemy Lines" is the watermelon of war films; it takes some doing to get through the rind, but once you get to the good part, it's pretty sweet, and more than worth the effort. And that's the magic of the movies.
BlandBasically, the flight sequence is probably the coolest air scene ever in a movie. Top Gun can't even compete really. The fireball is hokey, but overall the sequence is done pretty well. The rest of the movie is boring. Nothing to do with flying at all. It's one man versus an entire army, and guess who wins? It's a good old patriotism movie (This movie came out like a few months after 9/11, if I remember correctly).
This will put you on the edge of your seat!navigator Lt. Burnett (Own Wilson) and pilot Stackhouse (Gabriel Macht) are on their
last reconnaissance mission in their F-A18 Super Hornet fighter jet. It's Christmas day,
and the airmen are taking photographs over the Bosnia region when they pick up an
unidentified signal on their radar. They decide to venture off into the "no fly zone"
without knowing that all hell would soon break loose.
Sit down Top Gun. All I can say about Behind Enemy Lines is WOW! My jaw was on
the floor during the opening scene and the first thirty minutes. The special affects blew me
away watching the fighter jet try to avoid the heat seeking Surface to Air Missiles. Behind
Enemy Lines is pure fun and entertainment.
A well known cast including Gene Hackman fill the roles of Navy officers who find
themselves battling the enemy and higher command. Hackman, who plays a hard headed
Admiral is trying to bring home the pilots who were shot down on their mission. I have to
say that Owen probably wasn't the best pick for the lead role. His history of comedies
made him even less convincing, but mediocre acting didn't take away from intensity of the
movie, however it was probably bad enough to be scorned by the critics and ultimately not
make it as one of the best films this year. Regardless, I can't wait to add this to movie to
my collection.
Director John Moore is a wicked man who uses several unique approaches to Behind
Enemy Lines. Every gruesome scene reappears again somewhere in the form of a
flashback. There are several panning shots, and he even freezes the frame entirely at the
most climatic part of a particular scene. His aggressive approach may irritate some, but I
enthusiastically enjoyed it. It coincided with the dramatic aspects, and added to the
seriousness to Owen's role. Several closeups of actors and weapons bring you close to the
action.
Despite all the action and suspense, Behind Enemy Lines is not ruined by a usually ignored
plot. While often you'll think to yourself that one person could never survive some of the
things these characters went through, but for the most part Enemy Lines is believable.
The music was loud, especially the suspense trumpet noises that happen in every scene do
exaggerate the movie, while a pumped up soundtrack keeps the pace quick at the same
time.
You'll enjoy Behind Enemy Lines. The fighting scenes are graphic and provides the
audience with an overall good time. It's better than Spy Games, and probably the best
movie this year so far in respect to the action genre.
Former CIA analyst Jack Ryan, (Harrison Ford) is asked by his mentor and friend, Admiral Greer (James Earl Jones) to take over for him, while he battles cancer. Ryan reluctantly accepts. When a friend of the President's (Donald Moffatt) is killed, Ryan learns that a drug kingpin (Miguel Sandoval) may be responsible, for the crime. As he briefs the President, forces inside the administration, are working to take the cartel out, even without any proof. Ryan must discover the truth, about who is working against him before it's too late
The cast also includes the great Henry Czerny as Ritter, a smarmy guy at the CIA who butts heads with Ryan, Harris Yullin as the National Security Advisor, and Anne Archer returns as Cathy, Jack's wife. Directed by Philip Noyce, who also directed Patriot Games, the film stays within the framework of the book. The movie also is detailed enough to keep fans of the book happy, while at the same time it is nicely paced Ford proves once again why he's so right for roles like this. He wears his hero hat so well. It is Czerny though, that makes things really interesting for Ryan and, he gives the film an extra spark or two.
As part of the reissued "Jack Ryan" series on DVD, Clear And Present Danger, contains a retrospective featurette on how the film was made. It's pretty good and does a decent job taking you back, to what it was like on the set. The standard theatrical trailer tops off the extras. I wish there was a commentary track to go along with the other stuff--or maybe some deleted footage-that would have helped.
Still the DVD is recommended over the "movie only" edition from a few years ago