Michael-Bay Movie Reviews
More Pages: Michael-Bay Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41


Great scenery, Cute bears, Wholesome viewing.
"The Bears & I"Wayne's character protects three orphaned cubs. This action causes friction with the local Indian tribe who view the bear as their brother. Further trouble is caused when the US government decides to build a National Park on the property that the Indians are settled on. Maltin describes the film as Wayne trying to settle the problems between the Indians and the "white bigots", but there is NO scene or language of bigotry in the film. It is a matter of property rights and the rights of indigenous people.
The film is predictable as it is a Disney film, but it is very enjoyable. Wayne narrates the story in the first person. The scenery is breathtaking. The interplay of the bears is charming. The lessons learned at the end of the film are valuable. Fun fare for the family.
A side note: John Denver wrote and sung the title song "Sweet Surrender" for the film.
Based on a true story...

Great scenery, Cute bears, Wholesome viewing.A Concerned Christian Mom
"The Bears & I"Wayne's character protects three orphaned cubs. This action causes friction with the local Indian tribe who view the bear as their brother. Further trouble is caused when the US government decides to build a National Park on the property that the Indians are settled on. Maltin describes the film as Wayne trying to settle the problems between the Indians and the "white bigots", but there is NO scene or language of bigotry in the film. It is a matter of property rights and the rights of indigenous people.
The film is predictable as it is a Disney film, but it is very enjoyable. Wayne narrates the story in the first person. The scenery is breathtaking. The interplay of the bears is charming. The lessons learned at the end of the film are valuable. Fun fare for the family.
A side note: John Denver wrote and sung the title song "Sweet Surrender" for the film.
Based on a true story...

Good Entertainment
entertaining movie the is fun to watch
Harry Williams is WonderfullllThis movie does wonders for the soul. It is rich of life and laughter.
It is one of the first musicals that had a semi-black cast.
Big UPS to Bloodstone!
Love Nikki!
hi harry!


Hardly stellar...The film has a made for TV look and feel, with a plot that is not really original, or particularly credible. The script doesn't contain much action, or well-written dialog. The atmosphere of big brother government is pervasive. Tuxan, who routinely travels in a helicopter, is full of bluster, and attempts to orchestrate much of the action, yet doesn't actually do much that is impressive. The resolution to the story is rather unsatisfying, and implausible. Unless you enjoy heavy-handed government tactics, you can skip this drama.
Groundstar was released while Peppard was doing the TV show Banacek. Fans of that program, should be prepared for quite different type of character. The same applies to Christine Belford, who also had a reoccurring role on Banacek. There are no warm scenes with witty conversation between them. Michael Sarrazin has the most challenging role, and his performance while serviceable, is hampered by having to deliver some very bad lines.
This one has TV movie stink all over it....That being said, this movie plays out like a cheesy 70's TV melodrama. I tried hard to like this movie, but it was a hard sell. The movie starts out with multiple explosions at some facility, and one character managing to make it out before the whole place goes up. We see this character running down a corridor, being chased by other individuals, and then the picture freezes at a dramatic moment to allow for a credit to be displayed on the screen. This happens about four or five more times, and becomes quite tiresome, but if I recall, this was a device used quite a bit in the 70's, on movie but more so on TV. This movie really has a 'TV' feel to it, so I am wondering if the director was primarily a TV director...well, I was right. The director is Lamont Johnson, and he has an extensive career directing TV, and it shows here. Anyway, one character escapes before the whole place goes blammo, and it's Michael Sarrazin playing Welles. This is one of those actors who you may not recognize the name, but you'd probably recognize his face. He was fairly popular in the late 60's through the 70's. This slender, dark haired actor seemed to be on the verge of becoming a major star, but has since been relegated to mostly TV roles.
Well, he escapes, and we find out later that he was the only survivor of the explosion. His face badly damaged from the explosions, he manages to make it to the house of Nicole, played by Christine Belford, and actress with a solid television background and a few parts in some features films. The role I remember her from was the over protective mother to Arnie Cunningham in John Carpenter/Stephen King's killer car classic 'Christine' from 1983.
Well, we soon find out that that Welles, the soul survivor of the explosions, was also the one who caused the explosions. Apparently he used false credentials to get his position within the ultra top secret facility, then stole vital information, and caused the destruction of the facility to cover his escape. He remembers none of this, as he has lost his memory along with his face in the incident. We learn all this information from Tuxan, who is now investigating the situation.
There is a conspiracy, and it does follow though. The rest of the movie has Welles trying to put the pieces back together, recall what happened, if he could have killed those people and done the things Tuxan says he did. Nicole provides a haven for Welles, and seems sympathetic to his plight.
The most memorable line comes from Tuxan (what kind of name is that?) and is in response to Nicole berating him for invading her privacy by having hidden cameras and microphones in her house. He says something like 'murders are planned in private, assassinations are planned in private' etc. I don't remember the exact line, but it showed a great deal of the motivation behind the character.
The movie plays out, the conspiracy unfolds, and we are treated to a shocking ending. Well, not so shocking, really, but whatever. It was kind of hard to swallow, though. My main problem with this movie is I never really felt the tension that should have been there and the acting seemed kind of wooden. I enjoy a good conspiracy theory, but I had a hard time buying off on this one. The thing to keep in mind before you buy this movie is that it looks like a TV show. This was made in 1972, and prior to that, George Peppard had a somewhat promising movie career with Breakfast at Tiffany's (1961), How the West Was Won (1962), and The Blue Max (1966) to name a few. Then around 1971, the movie roles seemed to dry up and he went into TV. He did make a number of movie after 1971, Damnation Alley (1977), Battle Beyond the Stars (1977), but none seemed to really have the prestige of previous movie roles. The same could be said for Michael Sarrazin. And the other main character, played by Christine Belford was primarily a TV actress. Given the director's history in TV, this all adds up to making this look like a high budget TV movie. I think once some directors immerses themselves in a particular medium, it's difficult to expand beyond the boundaries proscribed by that medium, and it shows here. I felt like the director was trying to exceed his grasp, and couldn't quite do it. Not a bad movie, for TV, but not a great movie for the big screen. I'd say 3 stars for a TV movie, 2½ stars for a theatrical release.
Now there's something you don't see everyday

media demonization
An Australian perspectiveThe movie does a good job in building a profile of the Weaver family their Christian fundamentalist beleifs which in their case incorporates Anti Govt views,mixing with Neo Nazis,there own kids wearing Swastikas on their arms,teaching of hatred to their kids of others that do not look like them (ie non whites) & the belief that you can never have too many guns lying around the house.The family become isolated even from Vicki Weaver's parents & sister their views of things like the end of the world as we know it are too much for even for them.
Some have said this movie paints an unflattering portrayal of the Weaver's i did not find this.If anything i found it too much skewed against the FBI & the ATF.
The issues of responsibility of the Weaver's own actions are not addressed here.What happens when a man & his wife take their kids to an isolated location have little contact with the outside world,teach their kids hatred of others& their own govt?.Cople that with Fundamentalist beliefs that blind you to reason & understanding of others who do not share your views. Well the answer is not good & you can see them on a collision course with an unhappy ending.
Let's get to the bottom of this Right wing Ant Govt feeling.All of us in 1st world western countries can get get annoyed at our govt but we have avenues where we can channel our frustration IE voting,attending political meetings,working for a party or a person that beleives in the same things as you do,forming your own political party or if that is not enough run for office youself At local,state or Federal level.There is no excuse for people living in countries like the US to hold the anti govt views like the weavers did.Those that do should be booted out of the country & go to places like (if they even know these countries)China,Nth Korea,Iraq,Iran & coutless others where they can experiance for real brutal dictatorship & human rights violations by the truckload.
We have all seen what happens when hatred of Govt,ignorence & intolerance gets mixed together- April 19th 1995 Oklahoma 169 innocent Americans killed.
Enough Said
It Was Ten Years Ago: Remember Ruby RidgeThe movie has some mistakes. Randy Weaver was a short man and Randy Quaid was a poor choice to play him. He was a former Green Beret and not a slacker as he is sometimes portrayed in the movie. Laura Dern is made up to look like Vicki Weaver very well. Vicki was a strong woman but not the domineering type as she is sometimes made to be in the film.
Kirsten Dunst played Sara Weaver very well and was true to the character for the most part.Her performance in the second part of the movie alone is worth the price of the video .
There was no Confederate flag in front of the Weaver's cabin as is shown in the movie. There was never any real evidence that Randy broke the law and this is not shown well in the film. The shoot-out that took the lives of Vicki and her son was very well done. The part of the movie that shows the shoot-out and what followed is very accurate. In fact, the second part of the movie shows just how in the wrong the government was in what it did.
This August 21 will be the tenth anniversary of the Ruby Ridge murders. Read the book I mentioned and then view the film. Only then will you understand the danger our country is in from overbearing and power hungry tyrants.


A Sequel That Doesn't Live Up to the Original
The Price Of Stardom

Decent Independent Film Rent it instead of Buying
Loved this film

Decent Independent Film Rent it instead of Buying
Loved this film

A cow-boy travelling time
Holds your attentionLauren Hutton plays the pivotal character Georgia Crawford who must see that the perpetrator Klaus Kinski of Nosferatu fame does not do the dastardly deed.


fair detective movie
Going undercover
HE'S NO JACK lEMMON!!GOOD MOVIE THOUGH!!
A Concerned Christian Mom