Michael-J.-Fox Movie Reviews
More Pages: Michael-J.-Fox Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

The problems, meanwhile, emanate from the story line that brings these opposites together. Le Carré's novels are absorbing but typically internal odysseys that seldom offer the level of straightforward action or simple arcs of plot that the big screen thrives on. For The Russia House, written as glasnost eclipsed the cold war's overt rivalries, Le Carré means to measure how old adversaries must calibrate their battle to a more subtle, subdued match of wits. Barley himself becomes enmeshed in the mystery of the manuscript because British intelligence chooses to use him as cat's paw rather than become directly involved. Such subtlety may be a more realistic take on the spy games of the recent past, but it makes for an often tedious, talky alternative to taut heroics that Connery codified in his most celebrated early espionage role.
If the suspense thus suffers, we're still left with an affecting love story, as well as some convincing sniping between British and U.S. intelligence operatives, beautifully cast with James Fox, Roy Scheider, and John Mahoney. Veteran playwright Tom Stoppard brings considerable style to the dialogue, without solving the problem of giving us more than those verbal exchanges to sustain dramatic interest. --Sam Sutherland

TRULY INTRIGUING THEME WASTED BY WANDERING DIRECTION
A Strange, Poignant Tale Well ToldI have assembled a kind of personal "Cold War Archive", and this has an honored place in it along with "Smiley's People", & etc. It is a dandy story well told, not the usual "chase'm around and shoot'm up" action spy "thriller" of which we are all so tired. I give this four stars only because I believe the 5 star award in this category has been permanently retired with "Smiley's People".
The Russia House
The problems, meanwhile, emanate from the story line that brings these opposites together. Le Carré's novels are absorbing but typically internal odysseys that seldom offer the level of straightforward action or simple arcs of plot that the big screen thrives on. For The Russia House, written as glasnost eclipsed the cold war's overt rivalries, Le Carré means to measure how old adversaries must calibrate their battle to a more subtle, subdued match of wits. Barley himself becomes enmeshed in the mystery of the manuscript because British intelligence chooses to use him as cat's paw rather than become directly involved. Such subtlety may be a more realistic take on the spy games of the recent past, but it makes for an often tedious, talky alternative to taut heroics that Connery codified in his most celebrated early espionage role.
If the suspense thus suffers, we're still left with an affecting love story, as well as some convincing sniping between British and U.S. intelligence operatives, beautifully cast with James Fox, Roy Scheider, and John Mahoney. Veteran playwright Tom Stoppard brings considerable style to the dialogue, without solving the problem of giving us more than those verbal exchanges to sustain dramatic interest. --Sam Sutherland

TRULY INTRIGUING THEME WASTED BY WANDERING DIRECTIONBlair (Sean Connery) is a British publisher with a clear affinity for Russia, and has received a manuscript from Pfeifer's character, Katya, which he believes contains Soviet military secrets. The British intelligence SOMEHOW gets to know of this (will we ever know how and when) and Blair gets reluctantly involved in a plot to find out more about Katya and her associations. We are sort of made to feel on whose side Blair is on, and who the "bad guys" are (clue: CIA and the Queen's men of course) but my problem with the movie is it never really quite grabs you by the collar and drag you into the theme, or at least give the impression that anything terribly important is at stake.
It starts, goes on and on with some guys doodling in a very CIA like fashion amidst some glorious shots of Moscow, and suddenly everything comes to an end with the bad guys left in the dust by a very cleverly hatched scheme by Blair and Katya -- so sinister a scheme indeed than even the audience is left bewildered. Yeah.
While the movie sports some clever, even funny, moments, overall the narrative is boggling and wanders from concept to concept. Some directorial coherence for the audience would have been great. If the combination of Connery and Pfeifer intrigues you, especially a Russian accented Pfeifer, this may be worth a watch. Otherwise, a strangely intriguing movie.
A Strange, Poignant Tale Well ToldI have assembled a kind of personal "Cold War Archive", and this has an honored place in it along with "Smiley's People", & etc. It is a dandy story well told, not the usual "chase'm around and shoot'm up" action spy "thriller" of which we are all so tired. I give this four stars only because I believe the 5 star award in this category has been permanently retired with "Smiley's People".
The Russia House

Not the best of the trio, but you still gotta have it!The Old West scenes were fun to watch, though, and if you have a kid who likes trains, this may be their favorite movie in the trilogy. In this version, Doc's gotten stuck in the past and tells Marty to leave him alone - he's content to be inventing things back in the past, though he must find it frustrating to invent things he can't show anyone - his rule has always been that when you time-travel, you mustn't do anything to change the future.
Marty ends up back in the wild west in the Delorean, the very time-machine that needs plutonium to get it moving fast enough to warp into another time. When he lands, he manages to gouge a hole in the fuel tank, and eventually he realizes he's not going to find much plutonium in the Old West.
Oh, no! Are they stuck in the past forever? Not very likely, as Doc figures out how he can get them back to the future.
It is also frustrating for those of us who enjoy these movies that that some are in DVD, some in VHS, and the first is in limbo. However, eventually they'll all be out in DVD.
For now, I ordered all three in VHS format recently 'somewhere' - the first remains the best and our favorite, but you really have to have them all if you're going to fully enjoy them.
These movies are GREAT for the whole family to watch - we did these as a marathon one week-end, and was it fun. The first one is still the favorite, but that's because it lays the groundwork for this one and the next.
Just a little heads up for parents of young kids -I was surprised in watching this for the umpteenth time, but with a mom's eye and ear, to hear several really unnecessary cusswords scattered throughout all three movies. Oh, nothing to bad, but they could have been left out entirely. My 8-year old's eyes popped open - he knows that swear words are kind of a lazy person's short cut for saying what they want to - usually used by those low in vocabulary, weak on creative expression - but we just frowned a little, scratched our heads, and decided not to worry.
For those who don't have kids and think I'm being too prissy, just wait til ya have kids of your own!
Required to see, but not as good as the first 2!Not worth seeing this film unless you have seen both of the first two films.
The last of the Series from a Terrific Film.Directed by Robert Zemeckis (Cast Away, Death Becomes Her, Used Cars) made a enjoyable entertaining Fantasy/Comedy/Adventure Sequel that is Better than the Second One. Although this was the least Success at the Box Office, that played better on Video. The Leads are Terrific. DVD has an sharp Pan & Scan (1.33:1) transfer with an digitally remastered-Dolby Digital 5.1 Surround Sound. DVD has an Commentary Track by Zemeckis and Co-Writer:Bob Gale. The Another by the Producer:Neil Canton & Gale. DVD has tons of extras, including:Behind the Scenes featurette, a Deleted Scene, a Music Video and More. Written by the Director:Zemeckis & Co-Writer:Gale. Grade:A-


Where is the DVD???Unlike Body Heat, in which Lawrence Kasdan (director) formulaically uses film noir elements to tell a tale that grows increasingly more boring and tiresome, Dahl here does a brilliant job of weaving together elements of film noir in a completely fresh, intriguing, and powerful way. Yes, the femme fatale is here, but she's REALLY sexy and REALLY dangerous. And this HAS to be Linda Fiorentino's best performance ever. She is perfect for the part of Wendy, right on target.
Bill Pullman strikes the perfect note as the sleazy, half-whiny, conniving husband and Peter Berg is also perfect as the seemingly not-so-dumb hick from upstate New York--who's ultimately shown to be, in fact, astoundingly dumb in a revelatory scene. The characters, plot, and pacing all contribute to make this a truly great thriller. It's a shame this is not on DVD, truly.
Wicked Film NoirIn this clever story, Bridget has decided that her husband (Bill Pullman) is not as important as the money he received from a drug deal. She skips town with the cash only to hook up with the naïve Mike (Peter Berg) who will do anything for her, even murder. What transpires is too good to be true as sex and betrayal take center stage. The actors are outstanding and perfect for their roles. Fiorentino is a fireball who gives a ferocious performance worthy of an Oscar. Lacking any moral values, she lets it be known that messing with her will lead to trouble. Director John Dahl keeps the pace moving and throws in great twists right to the finish. This is a very underrated film noir and one that should not be missed.
Linda Fiorentino is the ultimate b***h goddess!

Almost perfect
This movie is one of Michael J. Fox's funniest roles!
the secret to my success is an asome movie

It Sucked
Flawed...but worth the watch
Disturbing war movie packs an emotional wallopUnfairly overshadowed by the simultaneous theatrical release of Oliver Stone's pompous (but still impressive) BORN ON THE FOURTH OF JULY (1989), Brian DePalma's CASUALTIES OF WAR recreates a harrowing incident from the Vietnam conflict - first reported in 'New Yorker' magazine in 1969 - in which a group of otherwise decent men succumbed to their own worst impulses and committed a terrible crime. Filmed with typical cinematic bravado by master craftsman DePalma, the movie uses every inch of the scope frame to convey both the duality of the landscape (vast swathes of breathtaking countryside, where sudden death lurks around every corner) and the moral vacuum which stretches the two central characters (Fox and Penn) to breaking point. Crafted with blistering simplicity by screenwriter David Rabe (himself a Vietnam veteran and author of the acclaimed stageplay 'Streamers'), the soldiers are depicted as brave individuals whose principles have been shattered by their traumatic combat experiences, leaving Fox to essay the role of peacemaker in a world where all the rules have been turned upside down. Thu Le - a model with no prior acting experience - is truly heartbreaking as the soldiers' terrified prisoner, and her ultimate fate is so horrific (arguably the most disturbing set-piece of this director's entire career), many viewers will be too appalled to see the film through to its inevitable conclusion. All in all, this uncompromising gaze into the abyss of human depravity packs a tremendous emotional wallop, and emerges as one of DePalma's strongest films to date.
The movie runs 113m 25s on Columbia TriStar's region 1 DVD, which letterboxes the wide Panavision frame at 2.35:1, anamorphically enhanced - try to see it on a 16:9 monitor. Released to most theaters in standard Dolby Stereo (reproduced here in 2.0 surround), the film was also given a 6-channel discrete mix for selected venues (in 70mm, blown-up from 35mm), and that version is recreated here in a vivid Dolby 5.1 presentation. Extras include a number of deleted scenes and a series of recently-filmed interviews with key personnel (including DePalma and Fox), many of which contain major spoilers, so be warned. A trailer is included, along with English captions and subtitles.


In Man Flint
A favorite two-hour escape.
Great Bond Spoof

In Man Flint
A favorite two-hour escape.
Great Bond Spoof

Pleasant entertainmentHOWEVER, I love this movie. Michael J. Fox is hilarious as well as convincing. The supporting cast is beautifully quirky, deceptively complex and interesting. There is a stunning contrast between the Washington DC hospital where Dr. Stone completes his training (violent & tumultuous), the small southern town that he is trying to escape (serene & friendly) and the LA plastic surgery practice that he wants to join(cold & impersonal).
While serving as the small town's GP, he learns through his interactions with the locals that living in a peaceful town is a quality of life choice - not a horrible fate for those that don't know better. I can watch this one over and over.
The little movie that could.Fox's young doctor, all full of spit and vinegar, sets off across country to medical nirvana: a highly sought position in a prestigious Beverly Hills plastic surgery practice. On the way, Doc Hollywood is waylaid in definitive small town USA, Grady Ga. on the cusp of the annual squash festival.
Am I boring you? Likely, but this film is never boring, a character driven comedy with superlative performances in each and every nook and cranny-particularly David Ogden Stiers (no Maj Winchester here) and Barnard Hughes. Woody Harrelson and Bridget Fonda have smallish parts. Even George Hamilton is bearable in a cameo.
Liked it so much, I headed out to find director Michael Caton-Jones previous effort, Memphis Belle.
Feel-Good Movie

Pleasant entertainmentHOWEVER, I love this movie. Michael J. Fox is hilarious as well as convincing. The supporting cast is beautifully quirky, deceptively complex and interesting. There is a stunning contrast between the Washington DC hospital where Dr. Stone completes his training (violent & tumultuous), the small southern town that he is trying to escape (serene & friendly) and the LA plastic surgery practice that he wants to join(cold & impersonal).
While serving as the small town's GP, he learns through his interactions with the locals that living in a peaceful town is a quality of life choice - not a horrible fate for those that don't know better. I can watch this one over and over.
The little movie that could.Fox's young doctor, all full of spit and vinegar, sets off across country to medical nirvana: a highly sought position in a prestigious Beverly Hills plastic surgery practice. On the way, Doc Hollywood is waylaid in definitive small town USA, Grady Ga. on the cusp of the annual squash festival.
Am I boring you? Likely, but this film is never boring, a character driven comedy with superlative performances in each and every nook and cranny-particularly David Ogden Stiers (no Maj Winchester here) and Barnard Hughes. Woody Harrelson and Bridget Fonda have smallish parts. Even George Hamilton is bearable in a cameo.
Liked it so much, I headed out to find director Michael Caton-Jones previous effort, Memphis Belle.
Feel-Good Movie
Blair (Sean Connery) is a British publisher with a clear affinity for Russia, and has received a manuscript from Pfeifer's character, Katya, which he believes contains Soviet military secrets. The British intelligence SOMEHOW gets to know of this (will we ever know how and when) and Blair gets reluctantly involved in a plot to find out more about Katya and her associations. We are sort of made to feel on whose side Blair is on, and who the "bad guys" are (clue: CIA and the Queen's men of course) but my problem with the movie is it never really quite grabs you by the collar and drag you into the theme, or at least give the impression that anything terribly important is at stake.
It starts, goes on and on with some guys doodling in a very CIA like fashion amidst some glorious shots of Moscow, and suddenly everything comes to an end with the bad guys left in the dust by a very cleverly hatched scheme by Blair and Katya -- so sinister a scheme indeed than even the audience is left bewildered. Yeah.
While the movie sports some clever, even funny, moments, overall the narrative is boggling and wanders from concept to concept. Some directorial coherence for the audience would have been great. If the combination of Connery and Pfeifer intrigues you, especially a Russian accented Pfeifer, this may be worth a watch. Otherwise, a strangely intriguing movie.