Stanley-Kubrick Movie Reviews


Related Subjects: Skeet-Ulrich
More Pages: Stanley-Kubrick Page 1 2 3 4 5
VHS movie reviews for "Stanley-Kubrick" sorted by average review score:

Full Metal Jacket
Released in VHS Tape by Warner Studios (04 February, 2003)
MPAA Rating: R (Restricted)
Director: Stanley Kubrick
Starring: Matthew Modine, Vincent D'Onofrio, and R. Lee Ermey
Stanley Kubrick's 1987, penultimate film seemed to a lot of people to be contrived and out of touch with the '80s vogue for such intensely realistic portrayals of the Vietnam War as Platoon and The Deer Hunter. Certainly, Kubrick gave audiences plenty of reason to wonder why he made the film at all: essentially a two-part drama that begins on a Parris Island boot camp for rookie Marines and abruptly switches to Vietnam (actually shot on sound stages and locations near London), Full Metal Jacket comes across as a series of self-contained chapters in a story whose logical and thematic development is oblique at best. Then again, much the same was said about Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey, a masterwork both enthralled with and satiric about the future's role in the unfinished business of human evolution. In a way, Full Metal Jacket is the wholly grim counterpart of 2001. While the latter is a truly 1960s film, both wide-eyed and wary, about the intertwining of progress and isolation (ending in our redemption, finally, by death), Full Metal Jacket is a cynical, Bush-era view of the 1960s' hunger for experience and consciousness that fulfilled itself in violence. Lee Ermey made film history as the Marine drill instructor whose ritualized debasement of men in the name of tribal uniformity creates its darkest angel in a murderous half-wit (Vincent D'Onofrio). Matthew Modine gives a smart and savvy performance as Private Joker, the clowning, military journalist who yearns to get away from the propaganda machine and know firsthand the horrific revelation of the front line. In Full Metal Jacket, depravity and fulfillment go hand in hand, and it's no wonder Kubrick kept his steely distance from the material to make the point. --Tom Keogh
Average review score:

Awesome movie! Junk Quality!
This is one of the great movies, a must own, 5 stars easy. Cast is perfect, dialog is superb, just a great flick!
The quality of this DVD blows! Audio was mediocre at best, no booklet, no commentary or bonus material. Package was cheap. Too bad 'cause the movie is first rate. 1 star for the package.

First half is the only part I watch; Ermey gets no 'props
After seeing Full Metal Jacket for the first time, I was amazed and enthralled by the performance of the Drill Instructor Hartman in the first half of the movie, as he whips his recruits into shape, preparing and conditioning them to kill, and survive, the hell of the Vietnam War. After several viewings, his profanity-laced abuses and strict disciplining of the recruits, especially the perennial screw-up "Private Pyle", have forever been burned into my memory. I find his many unforgettable remarks to be quite entertaining in a sick way. But I also realize that I would not be so amused if it were myself on the receiving end of his tirades.

Despite the fact that Lee Ermey once was an actual Marine D.I. and likely found his role not too difficult, I am deeply disappointed that he wasn't even considered for an Academy Award nomination for his part in the film.

I'm sorry to say I don't find the second part of FMJ to be nearly as engaging as the first. I usually just watch the Parris Island basic training part, and when that ends, rewind (okay, technically, you don't rewind a DVD), and watch the first half again. I really don't care about any "deeper meaning" that the second act might hold, I just want to see Hartman get on Private Joker's case again...

Hey, it's kind of like watching a full-length movie...

for those who always wanted to be in the corps
The quintessential Marine Corps movie! Kubrick created a masterpiece for those who want to ride along with a group of marines from boot camp thru Vietnam. Matthew Modine is an excellent cast as a young, idealistic, joking, pseudo-hippie who learns what war is all about! A fine job of casting for the different characters you would see in the Marine Corps. Kubrick is able to show the brotherhood that exist among marines and show the senselessness of what we were fighting for, yet display the loyalty and devotion to duty that makes the Corps the best fighting force ever!


Full Metal Jacket
Released in VHS Tape by Warner Studios (05 June, 1991)
MPAA Rating: R (Restricted)
Director: Stanley Kubrick
Starring: Matthew Modine, Vincent D'Onofrio, and R. Lee Ermey
Stanley Kubrick's 1987, penultimate film seemed to a lot of people to be contrived and out of touch with the '80s vogue for such intensely realistic portrayals of the Vietnam War as Platoon and The Deer Hunter. Certainly, Kubrick gave audiences plenty of reason to wonder why he made the film at all: essentially a two-part drama that begins on a Parris Island boot camp for rookie Marines and abruptly switches to Vietnam (actually shot on sound stages and locations near London), Full Metal Jacket comes across as a series of self-contained chapters in a story whose logical and thematic development is oblique at best. Then again, much the same was said about Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey, a masterwork both enthralled with and satiric about the future's role in the unfinished business of human evolution. In a way, Full Metal Jacket is the wholly grim counterpart of 2001. While the latter is a truly 1960s film, both wide-eyed and wary, about the intertwining of progress and isolation (ending in our redemption, finally, by death), Full Metal Jacket is a cynical, Bush-era view of the 1960s' hunger for experience and consciousness that fulfilled itself in violence. Lee Ermey made film history as the Marine drill instructor whose ritualized debasement of men in the name of tribal uniformity creates its darkest angel in a murderous half-wit (Vincent D'Onofrio). Matthew Modine gives a smart and savvy performance as Private Joker, the clowning, military journalist who yearns to get away from the propaganda machine and know firsthand the horrific revelation of the front line. In Full Metal Jacket, depravity and fulfillment go hand in hand, and it's no wonder Kubrick kept his steely distance from the material to make the point. --Tom Keogh
Average review score:

Awesome movie! Junk Quality!
This is one of the great movies, a must own, 5 stars easy. Cast is perfect, dialog is superb, just a great flick!
The quality of this DVD blows! Audio was mediocre at best, no booklet, no commentary or bonus material. Package was cheap. Too bad 'cause the movie is first rate. 1 star for the package.

First half is the only part I watch; Ermey gets no 'props
After seeing Full Metal Jacket for the first time, I was amazed and enthralled by the performance of the Drill Instructor Hartman in the first half of the movie, as he whips his recruits into shape, preparing and conditioning them to kill, and survive, the hell of the Vietnam War. After several viewings, his profanity-laced abuses and strict disciplining of the recruits, especially the perennial screw-up "Private Pyle", have forever been burned into my memory. I find his many unforgettable remarks to be quite entertaining in a sick way. But I also realize that I would not be so amused if it were myself on the receiving end of his tirades.

Despite the fact that Lee Ermey once was an actual Marine D.I. and likely found his role not too difficult, I am deeply disappointed that he wasn't even considered for an Academy Award nomination for his part in the film.

I'm sorry to say I don't find the second part of FMJ to be nearly as engaging as the first. I usually just watch the Parris Island basic training part, and when that ends, rewind (okay, technically, you don't rewind a DVD), and watch the first half again. I really don't care about any "deeper meaning" that the second act might hold, I just want to see Hartman get on Private Joker's case again...

Hey, it's kind of like watching a full-length movie...

for those who always wanted to be in the corps
The quintessential Marine Corps movie! Kubrick created a masterpiece for those who want to ride along with a group of marines from boot camp thru Vietnam. Matthew Modine is an excellent cast as a young, idealistic, joking, pseudo-hippie who learns what war is all about! A fine job of casting for the different characters you would see in the Marine Corps. Kubrick is able to show the brotherhood that exist among marines and show the senselessness of what we were fighting for, yet display the loyalty and devotion to duty that makes the Corps the best fighting force ever!


Full Metal Jacket
Released in VHS Tape by Warner Studios (04 February, 2003)
MPAA Rating: R (Restricted)
Director: Stanley Kubrick
Starring: Matthew Modine, Vincent D'Onofrio, and R. Lee Ermey
Stanley Kubrick's 1987, penultimate film seemed to a lot of people to be contrived and out of touch with the '80s vogue for such intensely realistic portrayals of the Vietnam War as Platoon and The Deer Hunter. Certainly, Kubrick gave audiences plenty of reason to wonder why he made the film at all: essentially a two-part drama that begins on a Parris Island boot camp for rookie Marines and abruptly switches to Vietnam (actually shot on sound stages and locations near London), Full Metal Jacket comes across as a series of self-contained chapters in a story whose logical and thematic development is oblique at best. Then again, much the same was said about Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey, a masterwork both enthralled with and satiric about the future's role in the unfinished business of human evolution. In a way, Full Metal Jacket is the wholly grim counterpart of 2001. While the latter is a truly 1960s film, both wide-eyed and wary, about the intertwining of progress and isolation (ending in our redemption, finally, by death), Full Metal Jacket is a cynical, Bush-era view of the 1960s' hunger for experience and consciousness that fulfilled itself in violence. Lee Ermey made film history as the Marine drill instructor whose ritualized debasement of men in the name of tribal uniformity creates its darkest angel in a murderous half-wit (Vincent D'Onofrio). Matthew Modine gives a smart and savvy performance as Private Joker, the clowning, military journalist who yearns to get away from the propaganda machine and know firsthand the horrific revelation of the front line. In Full Metal Jacket, depravity and fulfillment go hand in hand, and it's no wonder Kubrick kept his steely distance from the material to make the point. --Tom Keogh
Average review score:

Awesome movie! Junk Quality!
This is one of the great movies, a must own, 5 stars easy. Cast is perfect, dialog is superb, just a great flick!
The quality of this DVD blows! Audio was mediocre at best, no booklet, no commentary or bonus material. Package was cheap. Too bad 'cause the movie is first rate. 1 star for the package.

First half is the only part I watch; Ermey gets no 'props
After seeing Full Metal Jacket for the first time, I was amazed and enthralled by the performance of the Drill Instructor Hartman in the first half of the movie, as he whips his recruits into shape, preparing and conditioning them to kill, and survive, the hell of the Vietnam War. After several viewings, his profanity-laced abuses and strict disciplining of the recruits, especially the perennial screw-up "Private Pyle", have forever been burned into my memory. I find his many unforgettable remarks to be quite entertaining in a sick way. But I also realize that I would not be so amused if it were myself on the receiving end of his tirades.

Despite the fact that Lee Ermey once was an actual Marine D.I. and likely found his role not too difficult, I am deeply disappointed that he wasn't even considered for an Academy Award nomination for his part in the film.

I'm sorry to say I don't find the second part of FMJ to be nearly as engaging as the first. I usually just watch the Parris Island basic training part, and when that ends, rewind (okay, technically, you don't rewind a DVD), and watch the first half again. I really don't care about any "deeper meaning" that the second act might hold, I just want to see Hartman get on Private Joker's case again...

Hey, it's kind of like watching a full-length movie...

for those who always wanted to be in the corps
The quintessential Marine Corps movie! Kubrick created a masterpiece for those who want to ride along with a group of marines from boot camp thru Vietnam. Matthew Modine is an excellent cast as a young, idealistic, joking, pseudo-hippie who learns what war is all about! A fine job of casting for the different characters you would see in the Marine Corps. Kubrick is able to show the brotherhood that exist among marines and show the senselessness of what we were fighting for, yet display the loyalty and devotion to duty that makes the Corps the best fighting force ever!


Full Metal Jacket
Released in VHS Tape by Warner Studios (29 June, 1999)
MPAA Rating: R (Restricted)
Director: Stanley Kubrick
Starring: Matthew Modine, Vincent D'Onofrio, and R. Lee Ermey
Stanley Kubrick's 1987, penultimate film seemed to a lot of people to be contrived and out of touch with the '80s vogue for such intensely realistic portrayals of the Vietnam War as Platoon and The Deer Hunter. Certainly, Kubrick gave audiences plenty of reason to wonder why he made the film at all: essentially a two-part drama that begins on a Parris Island boot camp for rookie Marines and abruptly switches to Vietnam (actually shot on sound stages and locations near London), Full Metal Jacket comes across as a series of self-contained chapters in a story whose logical and thematic development is oblique at best. Then again, much the same was said about Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey, a masterwork both enthralled with and satiric about the future's role in the unfinished business of human evolution. In a way, Full Metal Jacket is the wholly grim counterpart of 2001. While the latter is a truly 1960s film, both wide-eyed and wary, about the intertwining of progress and isolation (ending in our redemption, finally, by death), Full Metal Jacket is a cynical, Bush-era view of the 1960s' hunger for experience and consciousness that fulfilled itself in violence. Lee Ermey made film history as the Marine drill instructor whose ritualized debasement of men in the name of tribal uniformity creates its darkest angel in a murderous half-wit (Vincent D'Onofrio). Matthew Modine gives a smart and savvy performance as Private Joker, the clowning, military journalist who yearns to get away from the propaganda machine and know firsthand the horrific revelation of the front line. In Full Metal Jacket, depravity and fulfillment go hand in hand, and it's no wonder Kubrick kept his steely distance from the material to make the point. --Tom Keogh
Average review score:

Awesome movie! Junk Quality!
This is one of the great movies, a must own, 5 stars easy. Cast is perfect, dialog is superb, just a great flick!
The quality of this DVD blows! Audio was mediocre at best, no booklet, no commentary or bonus material. Package was cheap. Too bad 'cause the movie is first rate. 1 star for the package.

First half is the only part I watch; Ermey gets no 'props
After seeing Full Metal Jacket for the first time, I was amazed and enthralled by the performance of the Drill Instructor Hartman in the first half of the movie, as he whips his recruits into shape, preparing and conditioning them to kill, and survive, the hell of the Vietnam War. After several viewings, his profanity-laced abuses and strict disciplining of the recruits, especially the perennial screw-up "Private Pyle", have forever been burned into my memory. I find his many unforgettable remarks to be quite entertaining in a sick way. But I also realize that I would not be so amused if it were myself on the receiving end of his tirades.

Despite the fact that Lee Ermey once was an actual Marine D.I. and likely found his role not too difficult, I am deeply disappointed that he wasn't even considered for an Academy Award nomination for his part in the film.

I'm sorry to say I don't find the second part of FMJ to be nearly as engaging as the first. I usually just watch the Parris Island basic training part, and when that ends, rewind (okay, technically, you don't rewind a DVD), and watch the first half again. I really don't care about any "deeper meaning" that the second act might hold, I just want to see Hartman get on Private Joker's case again...

Hey, it's kind of like watching a full-length movie...

for those who always wanted to be in the corps
The quintessential Marine Corps movie! Kubrick created a masterpiece for those who want to ride along with a group of marines from boot camp thru Vietnam. Matthew Modine is an excellent cast as a young, idealistic, joking, pseudo-hippie who learns what war is all about! A fine job of casting for the different characters you would see in the Marine Corps. Kubrick is able to show the brotherhood that exist among marines and show the senselessness of what we were fighting for, yet display the loyalty and devotion to duty that makes the Corps the best fighting force ever!


The Shining
Released in VHS Tape by Warner Studios (05 June, 1991)
MPAA Rating: R (Restricted)
Director: Stanley Kubrick
Starring: Jack Nicholson and Shelley Duvall
Stanley Kubrick's The Shining is less an adaptation of Stephen King's bestselling horror novel than a complete reimagining of it from the inside out. In King's book, the Overlook Hotel is a haunted place that takes possession of its off-season caretaker and provokes him to murderous rage against his wife and young son. Kubrick's movie is an existential Road Runner cartoon (his steadicam scurrying through the hotel's labyrinthine hallways), in which the cavernously empty spaces inside the Overlook mirror the emptiness in the soul of the blocked writer, who's settled in for a long winter's hibernation. As many have pointed out, King's protagonist goes mad, but Kubrick's Jack Torrance (Jack Nicholson) is Looney Tunes from the moment we meet him--all arching eyebrows and mischievous grin. (Both Nicholson and Shelley Duvall reach new levels of hysteria in their performances, driven to extremes by the director's fanatical demands for take after take after take.) The Shining is terrifying--but not in the way fans of the novel might expect. When it was redone as a TV miniseries (reportedly because of King's dissatisfaction with the Kubrick film), the famous topiary-animal attack (which was deemed impossible to film in 1980) was there--but the deeper horror was lost. Kubrick's The Shining gets under your skin and chills your bones; it stays with you, inhabits you, haunts you. And there's no place to hide... --Jim Emerson
Average review score:

Heeeere's Johnny! A modern horror classic on DVD
It's tough to believe that Stanley Kubrick received a Worst Director Razzie nomination for "The Shining." While "The Shining" may not be given the classic status of some of his other films like "Dr. Strangelove" and "2001", it's actually the least polarizing of this highly-praised and atypical filmmaker's work.

This atmospheric thriller is sure to creep you out with its pacing, eery editing and cinematography (those tracking shots are highly effective), and Jack Nicholson's powerful performance as Jack Torrance. Horror films often tend to divide audiences into genre fans who follow the gore and those who laugh in the face of so-called scares, insisting their own resiliancy to cheap thrills and lamebrain plotting.

Fortunately, "The Shining" doesn't make you take sides, because its chills come from plotting and character study as much as they do from odd sights that will make you jump. It may stray from Stephen King's book and not all of it may make sense, but "The Shining" has so much going for it that you won't mind. It's a gripping and satisfying film experience, and in my opinion, one of the best films of the '80s.

This Warner DVD re-release is definitely the version to get. The fullframe presentation comes at the wishes of Kubrick and the video and audio offer significant improvement over the drab initial release. (Unfortunately, the original Mono audio track has been dropped altogether in favor of an effective 5.1 remix. They could have included both with no problem.)

In the way of extras, there is an engaging half-hour on-set documentary, filmed by Kubrick's daughter Vivian. It provides a candid experience of the film's creation, and interviews with some of the actors. In addition, this DVD re-release includes an audio commentary on the documentary (sort of a "making-of the making-of") by Vivian Kubrick. There's also the spooky trailer, which shows how a movie preview can perfectly pique one's interest in a film, without spoiling (or even saying) much.

Possibly the Best Horror Movie Ever
This was a spectacular piece of work. It had a chilling soundtrack, and had some very good camera work. In the case of the Shining, a movie has finally exceeded the book upon which it was based. Things that would normally make a movie terrible have made the Shining a spellbinding movie. For example, the dialogue throughout the entire movie seems forced and unnatural. Another example is during an argument between Jack Nicholson (who performs incredibly well throughout the entire movie) and Shelley Duvall, after which Jack storms out of the room and glances at the camera as he goes by. If you're a horror fan, or just into movies, this is definetely one to see again and again and again.

"Heeeeerrre's Johnny!!"
I never read the book "The Shining" but I loved the movie. The story is about Jack Torrance (Nicholeson) and his wife, Wendy, and son Danny who move into a hotel, and weird things start to happen. Danny starts seeing evil things, and Jack starts going crazy, and wants to kill his family! The whole movie is scary and very cool, and I recommend it to Stephen King fans and horror movie fans. :)

The ONLY thing I hate about "The Shining" is Shelly Duvall as Wendy Torrance. She must be one of the worse actresses I've ever seen, next to Britney Spears and Mariah Carrey. I think they should've cast someone else as Wendy Torrance then whiny and pathedic actress Shelly Duvall. :-P


The Shining
Released in VHS Tape by Warner Studios (29 June, 1999)
MPAA Rating: R (Restricted)
Director: Stanley Kubrick
Starring: Jack Nicholson and Shelley Duvall
Stanley Kubrick's The Shining is less an adaptation of Stephen King's bestselling horror novel than a complete reimagining of it from the inside out. In King's book, the Overlook Hotel is a haunted place that takes possession of its off-season caretaker and provokes him to murderous rage against his wife and young son. Kubrick's movie is an existential Road Runner cartoon (his steadicam scurrying through the hotel's labyrinthine hallways), in which the cavernously empty spaces inside the Overlook mirror the emptiness in the soul of the blocked writer, who's settled in for a long winter's hibernation. As many have pointed out, King's protagonist goes mad, but Kubrick's Jack Torrance (Jack Nicholson) is Looney Tunes from the moment we meet him--all arching eyebrows and mischievous grin. (Both Nicholson and Shelley Duvall reach new levels of hysteria in their performances, driven to extremes by the director's fanatical demands for take after take after take.) The Shining is terrifying--but not in the way fans of the novel might expect. When it was redone as a TV miniseries (reportedly because of King's dissatisfaction with the Kubrick film), the famous topiary-animal attack (which was deemed impossible to film in 1980) was there--but the deeper horror was lost. Kubrick's The Shining gets under your skin and chills your bones; it stays with you, inhabits you, haunts you. And there's no place to hide... --Jim Emerson
Average review score:

Heeeere's Johnny! A modern horror classic on DVD
It's tough to believe that Stanley Kubrick received a Worst Director Razzie nomination for "The Shining." While "The Shining" may not be given the classic status of some of his other films like "Dr. Strangelove" and "2001", it's actually the least polarizing of this highly-praised and atypical filmmaker's work.

This atmospheric thriller is sure to creep you out with its pacing, eery editing and cinematography (those tracking shots are highly effective), and Jack Nicholson's powerful performance as Jack Torrance. Horror films often tend to divide audiences into genre fans who follow the gore and those who laugh in the face of so-called scares, insisting their own resiliancy to cheap thrills and lamebrain plotting.

Fortunately, "The Shining" doesn't make you take sides, because its chills come from plotting and character study as much as they do from odd sights that will make you jump. It may stray from Stephen King's book and not all of it may make sense, but "The Shining" has so much going for it that you won't mind. It's a gripping and satisfying film experience, and in my opinion, one of the best films of the '80s.

This Warner DVD re-release is definitely the version to get. The fullframe presentation comes at the wishes of Kubrick and the video and audio offer significant improvement over the drab initial release. (Unfortunately, the original Mono audio track has been dropped altogether in favor of an effective 5.1 remix. They could have included both with no problem.)

In the way of extras, there is an engaging half-hour on-set documentary, filmed by Kubrick's daughter Vivian. It provides a candid experience of the film's creation, and interviews with some of the actors. In addition, this DVD re-release includes an audio commentary on the documentary (sort of a "making-of the making-of") by Vivian Kubrick. There's also the spooky trailer, which shows how a movie preview can perfectly pique one's interest in a film, without spoiling (or even saying) much.

Possibly the Best Horror Movie Ever
This was a spectacular piece of work. It had a chilling soundtrack, and had some very good camera work. In the case of the Shining, a movie has finally exceeded the book upon which it was based. Things that would normally make a movie terrible have made the Shining a spellbinding movie. For example, the dialogue throughout the entire movie seems forced and unnatural. Another example is during an argument between Jack Nicholson (who performs incredibly well throughout the entire movie) and Shelley Duvall, after which Jack storms out of the room and glances at the camera as he goes by. If you're a horror fan, or just into movies, this is definetely one to see again and again and again.

"Heeeeerrre's Johnny!!"
I never read the book "The Shining" but I loved the movie. The story is about Jack Torrance (Nicholeson) and his wife, Wendy, and son Danny who move into a hotel, and weird things start to happen. Danny starts seeing evil things, and Jack starts going crazy, and wants to kill his family! The whole movie is scary and very cool, and I recommend it to Stephen King fans and horror movie fans. :)

The ONLY thing I hate about "The Shining" is Shelly Duvall as Wendy Torrance. She must be one of the worse actresses I've ever seen, next to Britney Spears and Mariah Carrey. I think they should've cast someone else as Wendy Torrance then whiny and pathedic actress Shelly Duvall. :-P


The Shining
Released in VHS Tape by Warner Studios (04 February, 2003)
MPAA Rating: R (Restricted)
Director: Stanley Kubrick
Starring: Jack Nicholson and Shelley Duvall
Stanley Kubrick's The Shining is less an adaptation of Stephen King's bestselling horror novel than a complete reimagining of it from the inside out. In King's book, the Overlook Hotel is a haunted place that takes possession of its off-season caretaker and provokes him to murderous rage against his wife and young son. Kubrick's movie is an existential Road Runner cartoon (his steadicam scurrying through the hotel's labyrinthine hallways), in which the cavernously empty spaces inside the Overlook mirror the emptiness in the soul of the blocked writer, who's settled in for a long winter's hibernation. As many have pointed out, King's protagonist goes mad, but Kubrick's Jack Torrance (Jack Nicholson) is Looney Tunes from the moment we meet him--all arching eyebrows and mischievous grin. (Both Nicholson and Shelley Duvall reach new levels of hysteria in their performances, driven to extremes by the director's fanatical demands for take after take after take.) The Shining is terrifying--but not in the way fans of the novel might expect. When it was redone as a TV miniseries (reportedly because of King's dissatisfaction with the Kubrick film), the famous topiary-animal attack (which was deemed impossible to film in 1980) was there--but the deeper horror was lost. Kubrick's The Shining gets under your skin and chills your bones; it stays with you, inhabits you, haunts you. And there's no place to hide... --Jim Emerson
Average review score:

Heeeere's Johnny! A modern horror classic on DVD
It's tough to believe that Stanley Kubrick received a Worst Director Razzie nomination for "The Shining." While "The Shining" may not be given the classic status of some of his other films like "Dr. Strangelove" and "2001", it's actually the least polarizing of this highly-praised and atypical filmmaker's work.

This atmospheric thriller is sure to creep you out with its pacing, eery editing and cinematography (those tracking shots are highly effective), and Jack Nicholson's powerful performance as Jack Torrance. Horror films often tend to divide audiences into genre fans who follow the gore and those who laugh in the face of so-called scares, insisting their own resiliancy to cheap thrills and lamebrain plotting.

Fortunately, "The Shining" doesn't make you take sides, because its chills come from plotting and character study as much as they do from odd sights that will make you jump. It may stray from Stephen King's book and not all of it may make sense, but "The Shining" has so much going for it that you won't mind. It's a gripping and satisfying film experience, and in my opinion, one of the best films of the '80s.

This Warner DVD re-release is definitely the version to get. The fullframe presentation comes at the wishes of Kubrick and the video and audio offer significant improvement over the drab initial release. (Unfortunately, the original Mono audio track has been dropped altogether in favor of an effective 5.1 remix. They could have included both with no problem.)

In the way of extras, there is an engaging half-hour on-set documentary, filmed by Kubrick's daughter Vivian. It provides a candid experience of the film's creation, and interviews with some of the actors. In addition, this DVD re-release includes an audio commentary on the documentary (sort of a "making-of the making-of") by Vivian Kubrick. There's also the spooky trailer, which shows how a movie preview can perfectly pique one's interest in a film, without spoiling (or even saying) much.

Possibly the Best Horror Movie Ever
This was a spectacular piece of work. It had a chilling soundtrack, and had some very good camera work. In the case of the Shining, a movie has finally exceeded the book upon which it was based. Things that would normally make a movie terrible have made the Shining a spellbinding movie. For example, the dialogue throughout the entire movie seems forced and unnatural. Another example is during an argument between Jack Nicholson (who performs incredibly well throughout the entire movie) and Shelley Duvall, after which Jack storms out of the room and glances at the camera as he goes by. If you're a horror fan, or just into movies, this is definetely one to see again and again and again.

"Heeeeerrre's Johnny!!"
I never read the book "The Shining" but I loved the movie. The story is about Jack Torrance (Nicholeson) and his wife, Wendy, and son Danny who move into a hotel, and weird things start to happen. Danny starts seeing evil things, and Jack starts going crazy, and wants to kill his family! The whole movie is scary and very cool, and I recommend it to Stephen King fans and horror movie fans. :)

The ONLY thing I hate about "The Shining" is Shelly Duvall as Wendy Torrance. She must be one of the worse actresses I've ever seen, next to Britney Spears and Mariah Carrey. I think they should've cast someone else as Wendy Torrance then whiny and pathedic actress Shelly Duvall. :-P


Barry Lyndon
Released in VHS Tape by Warner Studios (12 June, 2001)
MPAA Rating: PG (Parental Guidance Suggested)
Director: Stanley Kubrick
Starring: Ryan O'Neal and Marisa Berenson
In 1975 the world was at Stanley Kubrick's feet. His films Dr. Strangelove, 2001: A Space Odyssey, and A Clockwork Orange, released in the previous dozen years, had provoked rapture and consternation--not merely in the film community, but in the culture at large. On the basis of that smashing hat trick, Kubrick was almost certainly the most famous film director of his generation, and absolutely the one most likely to rewire the collective mind of the movie audience. And what did this radical, at-least-20-years-ahead-of-his-time filmmaker give the world in 1975? A stately, three-hour costume drama based on an obscure Thackeray novel from 1844. A picaresque story about an Irish lad (Ryan O'Neal, then a major star) who climbs his way into high society, Barry Lyndon bewildered some critics (Pauline Kael called it "an ice-pack of a movie") and did only middling business with patient audiences. The film was clearly a technical advance, with its unique camerawork (incorporating the use of prototype Zeiss lenses capable of filming by actual candlelight) and sumptuous production design. But its hero is a distinctly underwhelming, even unsympathetic fellow, and Kubrick does not try to engage the audience's emotions in anything like the usual way.

Why, then, is Barry Lyndon a masterpiece? Because it uncannily captures the shape and rhythm of a human life in a way few other films have; because Kubrick's command of design and landscape is never decorative but always apiece with his hero's journey; and because every last detail counts. Even the film's chilly style is thawed by the warm narration of the great English actor Michael Hordern and the Irish songs of the Chieftains. Poor Barry's life doesn't matter much in the end, yet the care Kubrick brings to the telling of it is perhaps the director's most compassionate gesture toward that most peculiar species of animal called man. And the final, wry title card provides the perfect Kubrickian sendoff--a sentiment that is even more poignant since Kubrick's premature death. --Robert Horton

Average review score:

Very good period epic, but doesn't feel like a Kubrick film.
I just revisited Stanley Kubrick's Barry Lyndon several years after my first viewing. I can remember not enjoying it so well the first time around, however, the second time I really did like it. It really doesn't feel like a three-hour film. When I first saw it, around the age of 18 or so, I was expecting something closer to the Kubrick films that I knew and loved like 2001, A Clockwork Orange and The Shining. I did not expect a rather straight-forward period costume epic. I thought there would be something out of the ordinary about it. Some bizarre characters, wicked twists, graphic violence, dreamlike scenes. Yet Barry Lyndon contains none of this.

It's an epic drama about the rise and fall of an Irish rogue in the late 18th century. Lavishly photographed, using only natural light, real costumes, good acting (with possible exception of Ryan O'Neal), but somehow lacking the Kubrick feel. It's a pretty conventional film. There's nothing really outlandish about it. However, being written (based on a 19th century novel), produced and directed by the man, it is undeniably a Stanley Kubrick film and deserves attention as such. Perhaps the most Kubrickian (if I may use the term) thing about Barry Lyndon is how un-Kubrick-like it is. Audiences had come to expect the unexpected from Kubrick, and what would be more unpredictable than to follow-up a film like A Clockwork Orange with a costume epic set in the 18th century? That's the way he was. Always taking the divergent path.

Now, regarding the film itself, it's very well made, not surprising considering its creator. The story of Redmond Barry is interesting, particularly in its historical context. Several wonderful scenes alone make the film worth watching. A small battle scene during the Seven Years War, the card-playing scenes, and the duel between Barry and his stepson near the end. There are some sporadic scenes with dazzling camera work and Kubrick manages to sneak in a couple of his tracking shots. The film is leisurely paced, as nearly all Kubrick films, but interest is always maintained.

I don't think that anyone would claim Barry Lyndon Kubrick's greatest achievement, but it is a remarkable achievement nonetheless. Perhaps more accessible to mainstream audiences than his typical work, Barry Lyndon is definitely an enjoyable experience for fans of Kubrick, but perhaps more so for fans of lavish costume epics. So enjoy it for what it is, just don't expect any of the old ultraviolence.

Beautiful
I've heard complaints that Barry Lyndon and other Kubrick films lack character depth and emotional involvement. Well, this may sound wierd, but this is the kind of movie I can watch purely for visual enjoyment. Every shot in this film is stunning, like a 17th century painting or something. Barry Lyndon is very much like 2001: A Space Odyssey; slow-moving, beautiful, and hypnotizing. And as far as the 'lack of depth' thing, Kubrick's recognizable and inimitable camera style says it all. The camera usually remains at a distance from the action (except for rare exceptions like fight scenes) , and simply observes. So I guess you could say that Kubrick's style is shallow, but I believe it's meant to be. We aren't supposed to know the motives and inner workings of every character, because after all, we're only observers.
Barry Lyndon is overlooked, underrated, and thoroughly deserving of your attention.

Lavish, engrossing, picaresque
Stanley Kubrick's beautifully opulent production takes many liberties with William Makepeace Thackeray's picaresque romance, The Memoirs of Barry Lyndon, Esq (1843), narrated in the first person depicting events from the eighteenth century. In particular, Redmond Barry who becomes Barry Lyndon, is something of an admirable rake, whereas in Thackeray's novel he is a braggart, a bully and a scoundrel. No matter. Kubrick, in keeping with a long-standing filmland tradition, certainly has license, and Thackeray won't mind.

Ryan O'Neal is the unlikely star, and he does a good job, rising from humble Irish origins to the decadence of titled wealth, employing a two-fisted competence in the manly arts, including some soldiering, some thievery at cards and a presumed consummate skill in the bedroom. Marisa Berenson plays Lady Lyndon, whom Barry has managed to seduce; and when her elderly husband dies, she marries Barry thus elevating his social and economic station in life. But Barry is rather clumsy at playing at peerage, and bit by bit manages to squander most of the Lyndon fortune until his stepson, Lord Bullingdon (Leon Vitali) grows old enough to do something about it.

This really is a gorgeous movie thanks to the exquisite sets and costumes and especially to John Alcott's dreamy cinematography and a fine score by Leonard Rosenman. The 184 minutes go by almost without notice as we are engrossed in the rise and fall of Barry's fortunes. There is fine acting support from Patrick Magee as the Chevalier de Balibari and Leonard Rossiter as Captain Quinn, and a number of lesser players, who through Kubrick's direction bring to life Europe around the time of the Seven Years War (1754-1763) when decadence and aristocratic privilege were still in full flower.

The script features two dueling scenes, the first showing the combatants firing at one another simultaneously at the drop of a white kerchief, the second has Barry and his stepson face each other ten paces apart, but due to the flip of a coin, the stepson fires first. Both scenes are engrossing as we see the loading of the pistols with powder, ball and ramrod, and we are able to note how heavy the pistols are and how difficult it must be to hit a silhouette at even a short distance. It is this kind of careful attention to directional detail that absorbs us in the action and makes veracious the story. Notice too the way the British soldiers march directly en mass toward the French guns. They actually used to fight battles that way! Also note the incredible pile of hair atop Lady Lyndon's head. Surely this is some kind of cinematic record.

Bottom line: one of Kubrick's best, certainly his most beautiful film.


Barry Lyndon
Released in VHS Tape by Warner Studios (29 June, 1999)
MPAA Rating: PG (Parental Guidance Suggested)
Director: Stanley Kubrick
Starring: Ryan O'Neal and Marisa Berenson
In 1975 the world was at Stanley Kubrick's feet. His films Dr. Strangelove, 2001: A Space Odyssey, and A Clockwork Orange, released in the previous dozen years, had provoked rapture and consternation--not merely in the film community, but in the culture at large. On the basis of that smashing hat trick, Kubrick was almost certainly the most famous film director of his generation, and absolutely the one most likely to rewire the collective mind of the movie audience. And what did this radical, at-least-20-years-ahead-of-his-time filmmaker give the world in 1975? A stately, three-hour costume drama based on an obscure Thackeray novel from 1844. A picaresque story about an Irish lad (Ryan O'Neal, then a major star) who climbs his way into high society, Barry Lyndon bewildered some critics (Pauline Kael called it "an ice-pack of a movie") and did only middling business with patient audiences. The film was clearly a technical advance, with its unique camerawork (incorporating the use of prototype Zeiss lenses capable of filming by actual candlelight) and sumptuous production design. But its hero is a distinctly underwhelming, even unsympathetic fellow, and Kubrick does not try to engage the audience's emotions in anything like the usual way.

Why, then, is Barry Lyndon a masterpiece? Because it uncannily captures the shape and rhythm of a human life in a way few other films have; because Kubrick's command of design and landscape is never decorative but always apiece with his hero's journey; and because every last detail counts. Even the film's chilly style is thawed by the warm narration of the great English actor Michael Hordern and the Irish songs of the Chieftains. Poor Barry's life doesn't matter much in the end, yet the care Kubrick brings to the telling of it is perhaps the director's most compassionate gesture toward that most peculiar species of animal called man. And the final, wry title card provides the perfect Kubrickian sendoff--a sentiment that is even more poignant since Kubrick's premature death. --Robert Horton

Average review score:

Save your money
This film is biography in the most straightforward sense. It simply recounts the events in a historical person's rather interesting life. Kubrick's goal, one supposes, was to bring this character back to life, for us to bear witness to his troubled heart. Unfortunately, by focusing his efforts on the period sets and costumes, he misses the mark, and leaves us struggling to connect with or understand who Redmond Barry really was or how his any of his myriad life decisions were made. I suppose all that detail was lost to the history filter, and Kubrick does not exert his license to flesh out his historical protagonist with human characteristics. Redmond Barry's life involved many dramatic changes of circumstance and character, perhaps too many for even for a 3-hour movie to pull off convincingly. Also, contrary to other reviewers, I felt that casting all-American pretty boy Ryan O'Neil as the Irish commoner-cum-English-nobleman was a poor choice. In other words, it's not all Kubrick's fault that we can't connect with the protagonist. Beautifully filmed eye-candy, but missing the emotional hook.

Beautiful
I've heard complaints that Barry Lyndon and other Kubrick films lack character depth and emotional involvement. Well, this may sound wierd, but this is the kind of movie I can watch purely for visual enjoyment. Every shot in this film is stunning, like a 17th century painting or something. Barry Lyndon is very much like 2001: A Space Odyssey; slow-moving, beautiful, and hypnotizing. And as far as the 'lack of depth' thing, Kubrick's recognizable and inimitable camera style says it all. The camera usually remains at a distance from the action (except for rare exceptions like fight scenes) , and simply observes. So I guess you could say that Kubrick's style is shallow, but I believe it's meant to be. We aren't supposed to know the motives and inner workings of every character, because after all, we're only observers.
Barry Lyndon is overlooked, underrated, and thoroughly deserving of your attention.

Eighteenth Century Comes to Life
I saw this movie when it come out on the big screen, and I was blown away. I love Stanley Kubrick, but at the time, I really despised Ryan O'Neill so I hesitated to see the movie. Boy, was I glad I did.
I've read Thackeray's novel, and I really think that Kubrick was true to the story, almost to the letter of the book. Even though the movie was long, it was so beautiful to look at, that I found it to be a pleasure, and the 3 plus hours just flew by.
I especially loved the use of all natural light, including filming in candelight, and like other folks who have reviewed this movie, the frames were like pictures that had come to life. Lady Lyndon looked just like one of Gainsborough's peaches & cream wind-blown beauties, it was breathtaking.
The worst part of the movie was Ryan O'Neill, he's a rotten actor, really wooden, and his frat boy looks were not consistent with my mind's picture of Redmond Barry.
But even he did ok under Kubrick's guidance. I wonder how this movie would have turned out if there had been a really good young actor in the lead role.
In any event, Barry Lyndon is a masterpeice, and should not be missed.


Barry Lyndon
Released in VHS Tape by Warner Studios (12 June, 2001)
MPAA Rating: PG (Parental Guidance Suggested)
Director: Stanley Kubrick
Starring: Ryan O'Neal and Marisa Berenson
In 1975 the world was at Stanley Kubrick's feet. His films Dr. Strangelove, 2001: A Space Odyssey, and A Clockwork Orange, released in the previous dozen years, had provoked rapture and consternation--not merely in the film community, but in the culture at large. On the basis of that smashing hat trick, Kubrick was almost certainly the most famous film director of his generation, and absolutely the one most likely to rewire the collective mind of the movie audience. And what did this radical, at-least-20-years-ahead-of-his-time filmmaker give the world in 1975? A stately, three-hour costume drama based on an obscure Thackeray novel from 1844. A picaresque story about an Irish lad (Ryan O'Neal, then a major star) who climbs his way into high society, Barry Lyndon bewildered some critics (Pauline Kael called it "an ice-pack of a movie") and did only middling business with patient audiences. The film was clearly a technical advance, with its unique camerawork (incorporating the use of prototype Zeiss lenses capable of filming by actual candlelight) and sumptuous production design. But its hero is a distinctly underwhelming, even unsympathetic fellow, and Kubrick does not try to engage the audience's emotions in anything like the usual way.

Why, then, is Barry Lyndon a masterpiece? Because it uncannily captures the shape and rhythm of a human life in a way few other films have; because Kubrick's command of design and landscape is never decorative but always apiece with his hero's journey; and because every last detail counts. Even the film's chilly style is thawed by the warm narration of the great English actor Michael Hordern and the Irish songs of the Chieftains. Poor Barry's life doesn't matter much in the end, yet the care Kubrick brings to the telling of it is perhaps the director's most compassionate gesture toward that most peculiar species of animal called man. And the final, wry title card provides the perfect Kubrickian sendoff--a sentiment that is even more poignant since Kubrick's premature death. --Robert Horton

Average review score:

Very good period epic, but doesn't feel like a Kubrick film.
I just revisited Stanley Kubrick's Barry Lyndon several years after my first viewing. I can remember not enjoying it so well the first time around, however, the second time I really did like it. It really doesn't feel like a three-hour film. When I first saw it, around the age of 18 or so, I was expecting something closer to the Kubrick films that I knew and loved like 2001, A Clockwork Orange and The Shining. I did not expect a rather straight-forward period costume epic. I thought there would be something out of the ordinary about it. Some bizarre characters, wicked twists, graphic violence, dreamlike scenes. Yet Barry Lyndon contains none of this.

It's an epic drama about the rise and fall of an Irish rogue in the late 18th century. Lavishly photographed, using only natural light, real costumes, good acting (with possible exception of Ryan O'Neal), but somehow lacking the Kubrick feel. It's a pretty conventional film. There's nothing really outlandish about it. However, being written (based on a 19th century novel), produced and directed by the man, it is undeniably a Stanley Kubrick film and deserves attention as such. Perhaps the most Kubrickian (if I may use the term) thing about Barry Lyndon is how un-Kubrick-like it is. Audiences had come to expect the unexpected from Kubrick, and what would be more unpredictable than to follow-up a film like A Clockwork Orange with a costume epic set in the 18th century? That's the way he was. Always taking the divergent path.

Now, regarding the film itself, it's very well made, not surprising considering its creator. The story of Redmond Barry is interesting, particularly in its historical context. Several wonderful scenes alone make the film worth watching. A small battle scene during the Seven Years War, the card-playing scenes, and the duel between Barry and his stepson near the end. There are some sporadic scenes with dazzling camera work and Kubrick manages to sneak in a couple of his tracking shots. The film is leisurely paced, as nearly all Kubrick films, but interest is always maintained.

I don't think that anyone would claim Barry Lyndon Kubrick's greatest achievement, but it is a remarkable achievement nonetheless. Perhaps more accessible to mainstream audiences than his typical work, Barry Lyndon is definitely an enjoyable experience for fans of Kubrick, but perhaps more so for fans of lavish costume epics. So enjoy it for what it is, just don't expect any of the old ultraviolence.

Beautiful
I've heard complaints that Barry Lyndon and other Kubrick films lack character depth and emotional involvement. Well, this may sound wierd, but this is the kind of movie I can watch purely for visual enjoyment. Every shot in this film is stunning, like a 17th century painting or something. Barry Lyndon is very much like 2001: A Space Odyssey; slow-moving, beautiful, and hypnotizing. And as far as the 'lack of depth' thing, Kubrick's recognizable and inimitable camera style says it all. The camera usually remains at a distance from the action (except for rare exceptions like fight scenes) , and simply observes. So I guess you could say that Kubrick's style is shallow, but I believe it's meant to be. We aren't supposed to know the motives and inner workings of every character, because after all, we're only observers.
Barry Lyndon is overlooked, underrated, and thoroughly deserving of your attention.

Lavish, engrossing, picaresque
Stanley Kubrick's beautifully opulent production takes many liberties with William Makepeace Thackeray's picaresque romance, The Memoirs of Barry Lyndon, Esq (1843), narrated in the first person depicting events from the eighteenth century. In particular, Redmond Barry who becomes Barry Lyndon, is something of an admirable rake, whereas in Thackeray's novel he is a braggart, a bully and a scoundrel. No matter. Kubrick, in keeping with a long-standing filmland tradition, certainly has license, and Thackeray won't mind.

Ryan O'Neal is the unlikely star, and he does a good job, rising from humble Irish origins to the decadence of titled wealth, employing a two-fisted competence in the manly arts, including some soldiering, some thievery at cards and a presumed consummate skill in the bedroom. Marisa Berenson plays Lady Lyndon, whom Barry has managed to seduce; and when her elderly husband dies, she marries Barry thus elevating his social and economic station in life. But Barry is rather clumsy at playing at peerage, and bit by bit manages to squander most of the Lyndon fortune until his stepson, Lord Bullingdon (Leon Vitali) grows old enough to do something about it.

This really is a gorgeous movie thanks to the exquisite sets and costumes and especially to John Alcott's dreamy cinematography and a fine score by Leonard Rosenman. The 184 minutes go by almost without notice as we are engrossed in the rise and fall of Barry's fortunes. There is fine acting support from Patrick Magee as the Chevalier de Balibari and Leonard Rossiter as Captain Quinn, and a number of lesser players, who through Kubrick's direction bring to life Europe around the time of the Seven Years War (1754-1763) when decadence and aristocratic privilege were still in full flower.

The script features two dueling scenes, the first showing the combatants firing at one another simultaneously at the drop of a white kerchief, the second has Barry and his stepson face each other ten paces apart, but due to the flip of a coin, the stepson fires first. Both scenes are engrossing as we see the loading of the pistols with powder, ball and ramrod, and we are able to note how heavy the pistols are and how difficult it must be to hit a silhouette at even a short distance. It is this kind of careful attention to directional detail that absorbs us in the action and makes veracious the story. Notice too the way the British soldiers march directly en mass toward the French guns. They actually used to fight battles that way! Also note the incredible pile of hair atop Lady Lyndon's head. Surely this is some kind of cinematic record.

Bottom line: one of Kubrick's best, certainly his most beautiful film.


Related Subjects: Skeet-Ulrich
More Pages: Stanley-Kubrick Page 1 2 3 4 5