Tony-Goldwyn Movie Reviews


Beautiful, simply beautiful.
Excellent Potrayal of the Plight of Disability Services
Excellent!

An excellent choice...
A Masterpiece of American literature
A Musical and Dramatic Must See

Dang, but that Ashley's cute!I guess someone like Sandra Bullock or maybe Jennifer Anniston could have pulled off Ashley's role as Jane Goodall (no relation to the gorilla woman) - after all, chick-flick-chicks are pretty interchangable. But there's something about Ashley Judd that makes you sit up and think, gosh, this girl (woman, I guess) is just a little different. I'm gonna pay just a little more attention to this one.
Maybe it's the way her character interacts with the other actors. She's working with "professional supporting actors" Greg Kinnear and Marisa Tomei, not to mention the future Wolverine Hugh Jackman. None of their characters, as Jane's love interest, best friend, and roommate, respectively, have any reason to exist except to provide Ashley with opportunities to be adorable.
The screenplay is genuinely witty. There's one scene in which Ashley finds her diaphragm, which she has apparently been keeping in storage, and blows dust off it. That single action tells you more about her character's life than twenty pages of dialog. Another hilarious bit has Greg Kinnear's character reciting an imaginary "deconstruction" of male manipulation techniques in terms of Jane/Ashley's "New Cow Theory."
Ashley makes acting in a piece like this look easy, unlike Marisa Tomei, whose over-the-topness makes you a little conscious of the fact that she's "on" (don't get me wrong -- Marisa's cute, too, but she's no Ashley!).
There's a scene in which Ashley has to run. We all know that Ashley can run like frickin' Prefontaine. Yet she's playing a "girlie" girl, so she hams it up just enough, with the skidding and arm-waving, so that she looks like a puppy who can barely make it to its dish without banging into the refrigerator.
Okay, so I'm biased. But I liked this movie a lot.
Excellent

The Power of Courage; the power of love

Well Done MysteryThe accuracy of the costumes and the beauty of the New Zealand setting easily let your imagination place you right in this World War II drama. Give this film two minutes of your time and you'll be so deeply entrenched in the story you won't even be able to pause the DVD.
Rod Steiger gives one of his classic performances, and Tony Goldwyn (the guy you loved to hate in "Ghost") keeps you wondering whether he's a good guy or bad guy.
As the story unfolds, the twists and turns play on your emotions and keep your logic hard at work. This is a wonderful movie, and I am buying a copy for my parents just to take them on a trip back to a time long gone.


An intelligent thriller
Great Movie!This movie was really a pleasant surprise. Good story, great acting. If you like stuff like "A Simple Plan", then you'll like this. A real little-known gem.
Left me thinking
It's the summer of 1969. Neil Armstrong has made his "one small step for man," Woodstock is about to happen nearby (leading to a barely plausible dramatic coincidence), and while her husband is away on business, Pearl is cautiously receptive to the seductions of "the blouse man" (Viggo Mortensen), a hippie salesman who offers the adventure and passion that Pearl sacrificed to young pregnancy and marriage. Once the stage for infidelity is set, A Walk on the Moon progresses predictably, but first-time screenwriter Pamela Gray stays true to the emotions of her characters, and actor Tony Goldwyn (making a smooth directorial debut) maintains precisely the right tone to downplay most of the movie's dramatic clichés. Add to this a sharp dynamic between Lane and Paquin, whose performances create a substantial mother-daughter relationship. Graced by stolen moments and fleeting expressions that speak volumes, this unassuming little film is eminently worthwhile. --Jeff Shannon

Good concept, but the script should have been betterDiane Lane, cast as the mother, with her confusion and mixed loyalties, played her part well. So did the hippie lover, Viggo Mortensen, who has the kind of good looks that are sketched on the covers of romance novels. Anna Paquen is superb as the 14 year old daughter, coming of age herself, who goes to Woodstock and sees her mother there with the hippie. And the husband, played by Liev Shreiber is wonderful as he tries to cope with his wife's changes and his love for his family. Cast as Pearl's Jewish mother-in-law, Tovah Feldshuh should have been better. The role is a good one, but the Yiddish words as written in the script were awkward.
One of the reasons I hesitate to recommend this video is that the setting was artificial. For example, in the few Woodstock scenes, the sun was always shining and it seemed to last just one short afternoon. The real Woodstock lasted 3 days and it rained constantly. I also thought the Jewishness and silliness of the bungalow colony was overdone. Every single cliche and Yiddish expression were thrown in. I found this distracting from the central human story of a family trying to cope with a changing world. The scenes were much too long and the story moved too slowly. Too many scenes were just talking and no action. The plot was predictable and there were no surprises. And I kept looking at my watch every ten minutes.
The title refers to the moon walk by the astronauts, watched on flickering black and white television sets that summer. It's a big theme reflecting a changing world. But in spite of good acting and interesting story, this film tried hard, but just didn't make it.
Husbands, Rare Book Dealers & Blouse Men - Choices! Choices!
tender and abrasive simultaneously. . .lane is brilliant.The film deals with sexual repression. . . and the consequences of an awakening one Jewish mother of two experiences by having an affair on a family vacation during the summer of love.
As the first man walks on the moon, his experience coincides with this lady's first walk on the terrain of an extramarital affair. Both are free in a new frontier. She and her daughter both sneak to be a part of woodstock with harrowing results. Pay particular attention to Lane's return from the festival . . .she's nails it. Diane Lane portrays this character with both sympathy and scorn... breathtaking.


WHO SAYS HISTORY ISN'T INTERESTING!
We Need Another Truman!
Gary Sinise does it again!

Here's to the engineersToo often films that deal with invention focus on that moment when the problem comes together and is solved. What they fail to recognize is the first step, when the men and women are looking at the challenge ahead, has even more emotional potential.
Thankfully the writers and actors in this film did not forget this human truth.
The cast is excellent. The script is uneven, but the only reason this is obvious is because instead of staying mildly good throughout, like most made for cable films, this movie is mildly good with occasional scenes of brilliance; such as almost any moment what Langella or Spacey grace the screen.
If you are an engineer or just have one as a friend or member of the family, see this film. It's a wonder.
An Excellent Portrayl of Events Little of Us Know of...
Artillery, Saddam Hussein and the Mossad = Gulf WarHere's a few additional facts about the story to intrigue you:
Dr. Gerald Bull was the founder of Space Research Corporation ... a Canadian ballistics expert, Bull modified artillery weapons, worked on the USA's HAARP gun program and upgraded SCUD missiles for various customers. He did work for every country, except Russia, which he hated (but the SCUD's he modified were Russian-made). He also did work, through the CIA, for the USA and some of its allies.
Dr. Bull had to run things through the customs services of many countries of course to move his weapons. He ran afoul of U.S. Customs and got a year in a federal penitentiary for which he did not forgive the CIA, instead expecting immunity.
Bull was contracted by Saddam Hussein, who at that time was a pro-U.S. interest (against Iran and supported by then-Vice-President Bush) to build a "Supergun" that would fire a 2,000 lb shell over 100 miles (and further). Saddam's hope was to be able to shell Israel with bio/chem weapons from an artillery gun (which is not uncommon) but from great range. Israel had destroyed Iraq's nuclear weapons reactor (designed to produce weapons-grade plutonium) for which Saddam vowed revenge. The Mossad gave a lot of warnings to Bull about helping Iraq arm, which Bull repeatedly ignored.
the CIA and British MI6 turned a blind eye to Bull's operations in Iraq, for which Bull, expecting protection, gave them info on the German bunkers and C&C centers Saddam had constructed underground. Ah, but in the spy business there are no sweethearts, and the Mossad assassinated Bull in Brussels before he could finish the "Supergun" (the Babylon Gun) ... a smaller version, the "Baby Babylon" gun had been completed and tested at that time ...
This was all financed through a "bank" in America where funds were diverted from American taxpayers to Saddam, ostensibly for agricultural enterprises ... Saddam reportedly paid Bull $20-25 million for his work ... the mysoginistic viewpoint at the time was that any enemy of Iran (i.e. Iraq) is a friend of the USA ... didn't quite work out that way ...
After Bull was dead, MI6 feigned surprise at the discovery of "Supergun" barrel pieces being constructed in a foundry in England and they were impounded before they could all be shipped out (on Iraqi IL-76 transports I believe). Some pieces did make it out to Iraq.
Thus the silly and complicted politics of the Middle East ... where the USA once propped up the Shah of Iran and sold him 79 F-14A Tomcats, he was deposed and Iran became a U.S. enemy ... and still is to this day ... Saddam, a former protected entity, invaded Kuwait less than 6 months after Bull was assassinated ... and the rest was seen on CNN 24 hours per day.


Here's to the engineersToo often films that deal with invention focus on that moment when the problem comes together and is solved. What they fail to recognize is the first step, when the men and women are looking at the challenge ahead, has even more emotional potential.
Thankfully the writers and actors in this film did not forget this human truth.
The cast is excellent. The script is uneven, but the only reason this is obvious is because instead of staying mildly good throughout, like most made for cable films, this movie is mildly good with occasional scenes of brilliance; such as almost any moment what Langella or Spacey grace the screen.
If you are an engineer or just have one as a friend or member of the family, see this film. It's a wonder.
An Excellent Portrayl of Events Little of Us Know of...
Artillery, Saddam Hussein and the Mossad = Gulf WarHere's a few additional facts about the story to intrigue you:
Dr. Gerald Bull was the founder of Space Research Corporation ... a Canadian ballistics expert, Bull modified artillery weapons, worked on the USA's HAARP gun program and upgraded SCUD missiles for various customers. He did work for every country, except Russia, which he hated (but the SCUD's he modified were Russian-made). He also did work, through the CIA, for the USA and some of its allies.
Dr. Bull had to run things through the customs services of many countries of course to move his weapons. He ran afoul of U.S. Customs and got a year in a federal penitentiary for which he did not forgive the CIA, instead expecting immunity.
Bull was contracted by Saddam Hussein, who at that time was a pro-U.S. interest (against Iran and supported by then-Vice-President Bush) to build a "Supergun" that would fire a 2,000 lb shell over 100 miles (and further). Saddam's hope was to be able to shell Israel with bio/chem weapons from an artillery gun (which is not uncommon) but from great range. Israel had destroyed Iraq's nuclear weapons reactor (designed to produce weapons-grade plutonium) for which Saddam vowed revenge. The Mossad gave a lot of warnings to Bull about helping Iraq arm, which Bull repeatedly ignored.
the CIA and British MI6 turned a blind eye to Bull's operations in Iraq, for which Bull, expecting protection, gave them info on the German bunkers and C&C centers Saddam had constructed underground. Ah, but in the spy business there are no sweethearts, and the Mossad assassinated Bull in Brussels before he could finish the "Supergun" (the Babylon Gun) ... a smaller version, the "Baby Babylon" gun had been completed and tested at that time ...
This was all financed through a "bank" in America where funds were diverted from American taxpayers to Saddam, ostensibly for agricultural enterprises ... Saddam reportedly paid Bull $20-25 million for his work ... the mysoginistic viewpoint at the time was that any enemy of Iran (i.e. Iraq) is a friend of the USA ... didn't quite work out that way ...
After Bull was dead, MI6 feigned surprise at the discovery of "Supergun" barrel pieces being constructed in a foundry in England and they were impounded before they could all be shipped out (on Iraqi IL-76 transports I believe). Some pieces did make it out to Iraq.
Thus the silly and complicted politics of the Middle East ... where the USA once propped up the Shah of Iran and sold him 79 F-14A Tomcats, he was deposed and Iran became a U.S. enemy ... and still is to this day ... Saddam, a former protected entity, invaded Kuwait less than 6 months after Bull was assassinated ... and the rest was seen on CNN 24 hours per day.